Showing : Mfuzz reset
1
Vote
1
Reply
51
Views
0
Votes
0
Replies
103
Views
2
Votes
9
Replies
595
Views
0
Votes
0
Replies
237
Views
0
Votes
0
Replies
196
Views
0
Votes
1
Reply
662
Views
0
Votes
2
Replies
1.0k
Views
1
Vote
1
Reply
4.3k
Views
0
Votes
0
Replies
464
Views
0
Votes
0
Replies
786
Views
0
Votes
0
Replies
604
Views
0
Votes
2
Replies
1.5k
Views
0
Votes
1
Reply
793
Views
11.8 years ago dorothyc • 140 • updated 11.8 years ago James W. MacDonald 56k
0
Votes
1
Reply
700
Views
0
Votes
4
Replies
2.5k
Views
15 results • Page 1 of 1
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: DESeq2 and shrinkage of log2 fold changes by Michael Love 31k
What do you mean that the set with FDR bound increases? Shrinkage methods in current versions of DESeq2 do not change the FDR (`padj` colum…
Answer: The compare result is different in score and Conc in DiffBind by shangguandong1996 • 20
I know in newer DiffBind version, the default of `score` argument is different, So I post a newer DiffBind version result. ``` library(…
Answer: Conc_1 in differnet dba.report result is slightly different by shangguandong1996 • 20
For a newer DiffBind version ``` library(DiffBind) library(BiocParallel) library(dplyr) tamoxifen <- dba(sampleSheet="tamoxifen.csv") ta…
Comment: Conc_1 in differnet dba.report result is slightly different by shangguandong1996 • 20
Hi, Dr Stark I just find you fixed the link, and I want to use the test data to reproduce my issue ``` library(DiffBind) library(BiocPara…
Comment: DESeq2 and shrinkage of log2 fold changes by Asier • 0
One question related to this. In the case of using the schrinkage (in my dataset of miRNA-seq) the number of SDE miRNAs (FDR) increases wit…
Locations • All
United States, 1 minute ago
America, 6 minutes ago
United States, 27 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 53 minutes ago
Switzerland, 1 hour ago
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.3