9 months ago • updated 12 weeks ago
Nala
•
0
0
Votes
2
Replies
89
Views
0
Votes
0
Replies
63
Views
12 months ago
A
•
40
1
Vote
1
Reply
181
Views
•
updated
22 months ago
James W. MacDonald
56k
1
Vote
2
Replies
538
Views
•
updated
2.2 years ago
lhuang7
•
50
2
Votes
4
Replies
988
Views
3.0 years ago
topijush
•
10
1
Vote
1
Reply
366
Views
•
updated
3.2 years ago
Sean Davis
21k
0
Votes
5
Replies
935
Views
4.2 years ago • updated 3.3 years ago
poojitha.stemcell
•
0
0
Votes
0
Replies
613
Views
3.7 years ago
gitteba
•
0
0
Votes
0
Replies
573
Views
3.8 years ago
rahel14350
•
10
0
Votes
10
Replies
1.3k
Views
•
updated
3.8 years ago
Tim Peters
•
120
0
Votes
1
Reply
832
Views
4.0 years ago
Tom
•
10
0
Votes
2
Replies
560
Views
•
updated
4.1 years ago
tgorri
•
10
1
Vote
1
Reply
670
Views
•
updated
4.9 years ago
Mike Smith
♦
4.8k
4
Votes
10
Replies
3.2k
Views
•
updated
4.9 years ago
Peter Hickey
•
460
0
Votes
6
Replies
2.2k
Views
•
updated
5.6 years ago
James W. MacDonald
56k
0
Votes
7
Replies
1.1k
Views
7.2 years ago
Juan Fernández Tajes
•
190
0
Votes
10
Replies
1.2k
Views
•
updated
7.2 years ago
Tim Triche
♦
4.2k
0
Votes
0
Replies
555
Views
7.2 years ago
Allegra Petti
•
120
0
Votes
2
Replies
1.7k
Views
•
updated
7.6 years ago
Kasper Daniel Hansen
6.5k
0
Votes
1
Reply
896
Views
•
updated
7.6 years ago
VSM
•
120
0
Votes
0
Replies
484
Views
0
Votes
0
Replies
1.4k
Views
7.8 years ago
Guest User
♦
12k
0
Votes
1
Reply
800
Views
7.9 years ago
Srinivas Srikanth
•
70
0
Votes
0
Replies
545
Views
0
Votes
0
Replies
696
Views
8.1 years ago
Guest User
♦
12k
0
Votes
0
Replies
633
Views
8.7 years ago
Briggs, Chris
•
20
0
Votes
0
Replies
564
Views
8.8 years ago
Pan Du
•
440
0
Votes
1
Reply
724
Views
•
updated
8.8 years ago
Tim Triche
♦
4.2k
0
Votes
0
Replies
1.2k
Views
8.9 years ago
Tim Triche
♦
4.2k
0
Votes
2
Replies
2.0k
Views
•
updated
8.9 years ago
Tim Triche
♦
4.2k
0
Votes
1
Reply
723
Views
•
updated
9.1 years ago
Valerie Obenchain
♦
6.7k
0
Votes
0
Replies
640
Views
9.2 years ago
Shruti Rastogi
•
10
0
Votes
3
Replies
1.0k
Views
•
updated
9.3 years ago
Martin Morgan
25k
0
Votes
2
Replies
537
Views
•
updated
9.6 years ago
Ina Hoeschele
•
610
0
Votes
0
Replies
444
Views
0
Votes
3
Replies
857
Views
•
updated
10.3 years ago
Sean Davis
21k
0
Votes
2
Replies
641
Views
•
updated
10.3 years ago
Sean Davis
21k
0
Votes
0
Replies
599
Views
10.4 years ago
gregory voisin
•
430
0
Votes
1
Reply
626
Views
•
updated
10.5 years ago
Davis, Wade
•
350
0
Votes
0
Replies
447
Views
10.5 years ago
Jinyan Huang
•
50
0
Votes
0
Replies
681
Views
10.6 years ago
Noemi Andor
•
100
0
Votes
2
Replies
679
Views
•
updated
11.0 years ago
Sean Davis
21k
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: DESeq2 and shrinkage of log2 fold changes
by
Michael Love
31k
What do you mean that the set with FDR bound increases? Shrinkage methods in current versions of DESeq2 do not change the FDR (`padj` colum…
Answer: The compare result is different in score and Conc in DiffBind
by
shangguandong1996
•
20
I know in newer DiffBind version, the default of `score` argument is different, So I post a newer DiffBind version result.
```
library(…
Answer: Conc_1 in differnet dba.report result is slightly different
by
shangguandong1996
•
20
For a newer DiffBind version
```
library(DiffBind)
library(BiocParallel)
library(dplyr)
tamoxifen <- dba(sampleSheet="tamoxifen.csv")
ta…
Comment: Conc_1 in differnet dba.report result is slightly different
by
shangguandong1996
•
20
Hi, Dr Stark
I just find you fixed the link, and I want to use the test data to reproduce my issue
```
library(DiffBind)
library(BiocPara…
Comment: DESeq2 and shrinkage of log2 fold changes
by
Asier
•
0
One question related to this. In the case of using the schrinkage (in my dataset of miRNA-seq) the number of SDE miRNAs (FDR) increases wit…
Votes