Question: seqnames versus chrom
0
gravatar for felix.ernst
17 months ago by
felix.ernst0 wrote:

Dear all,

I can retrieve the chromosome names stored in a GRanges object either using GenomeInfoDb::seqnames() or rtracklayer::chrom(). This deviates from the use of the other accessor functions, such as BiocGenerics::start(), BiocGenerics::end(), etc

Is there a reason for this split up? Is there a best practice, which function (seqnames or chrom) to use?

Thanks for the suggestions.

Cheers,

Felix

 

 

ADD COMMENTlink modified 17 months ago by Michael Lawrence11k • written 17 months ago by felix.ernst0
Answer: seqnames versus chrom
1
gravatar for Michael Lawrence
17 months ago by
United States
Michael Lawrence11k wrote:

Stick with seqnames(). The chrom() accessor is from before GRanges existed. Should probably be deprecated.

ADD COMMENTlink written 17 months ago by Michael Lawrence11k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 16.09
Traffic: 240 users visited in the last hour