very low number in normalized count but give very high in log2foldchange
1
0
Entering edit mode
naktang1 • 0
@naktang1-8825
Last seen 4.7 years ago
Thailand

I have one gene that have very high in log2foldchange.

gene

baseMean

log2FoldChange

lfcSE

stat

pvalue

padj

geneA

 50.46458

41.13637

3.733037

11.01955

3.08E-28

1.19E-23

 

so the foldchange is 41  while the basemean is 50.46

 

However, when i check the  normalized count and sizefactor

counts(dds["gene.118755",],normalized=T)
              D13_ABC_C1_count  D13_ABC_C2_count   D13_ABC_H1_count    D13_ABC_H2_count
gene.118755         0                 0                 0             1.129077

                            D13_ABC_C1_count D13_ABC_C2_count D13_ABC_H1_count D13_ABC_H2_count

sizeFactors(dds)      0.7990090                      0.8081792                 0.5362605                        2.6570366

 

My question is why this gene has a very small in normalized count but still give a very high number in folchange of this gene              

 

I compare between D13_ABC_H vs D13_ABC_C condition.

 

 

deseq2 • 811 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

thank you for you reply, However what threshold level for LFC that you will recommend to use lfcshrink function

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

We can't provide that because it is specific to your experiment. I don't know what is a biologically meaningful fold change for you samples. I'd recommend coming up with this through discussion with other biologists and investigators (if you are collaborating).

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode
@mikelove
Last seen 2 hours ago
United States

The LFC is not defined because you have positive vs zeros. You should use lfcShrink to provide accurate LFC estimates.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 798 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6