Order of probesets in an exprSet
2
0
Entering edit mode
@jamain-adrien-j-1300
Last seen 9.6 years ago
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/attachments/20051107/ 007450f4/attachment.pl
• 695 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@rafael-a-irizarry-205
Last seen 9.6 years ago
fortuitous. look at indexProbes. we use whatever order ls gives us. -r On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Jamain, Adrien J wrote: > Dear BioC people, > > I have a little technical question about how the order of the probesets > in an exprSet is defined. > Is this order given by the order of the probesets in the corresponding > cdf environment (e.g. ls(mouse4302cdf))? > Or is it alphabetical? > Or is it "unconstrained"? > > In the examples I've looked at both the order of the probesets in the > cdf environment and the exprSets are the same (and alphabetical). > > But is it a characteristic which is desired by development or is it just > fortuitous? > > Thank you in advance for your insight... > Adrien Jamain > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@lgautieralternorg-747
Last seen 9.6 years ago
> Dear BioC people, > > I have a little technical question about how the order of the probesets > in an exprSet is defined. > Is this order given by the order of the probesets in the corresponding > cdf environment (e.g. ls(mouse4302cdf))? > Or is it alphabetical? > Or is it "unconstrained"? > > In the examples I've looked at both the order of the probesets in the > cdf environment and the exprSets are the same (and alphabetical). There is probably no "order" in a cdf environment (in the sense people think of it). This is a hash table, and the order in which elements are returned depends on the implementation of it, and eventually on the keys in the hash table. I would suspect that R returns keys in alphabetical order (but I am not sure of that, and therefore never -or should not- assume it blindly in my code). Having the same order (at least on the same platform) is implicit if you used 'expresso' (or wrappers) without specifying a list of probe set IDs to work with: an exprSet is then obtained by looping through all keys in the cdfenv (and in the order these keys are returned, AFAIR). Hoping this helps, L. > But is it a characteristic which is desired by development or is it just > fortuitous? > > Thank you in advance for your insight... > Adrien Jamain > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 555 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6