EdgeR - How to set up the design matrix for a multifactorial experimental design with interactions?
1
0
Entering edit mode
D ▴ 10
@d-16116
Last seen 3.0 years ago
UK

Dear All,

I have performed RNAseq on an experimental design using 6 samples subject to two rounds of treatments: The first treatment uses a molecule that induces a signalling pathway (T1), the second round of treatment uses two drugs that disrupt that signalling pathway (D2_A and D2_B). The drugs used in the second round are used independently (i.e. drug 2_A and drug 2_B are not used together in any one sequencing reaction). The samples are paired, such that each of the 6 samples was subject to all combinations of the treatments.

As such I have an experimental design that looks something like this (for the first sample), where NT=no treatment 1 and ND = no treatment 2:

6 (samples) x 2 (treatment 1) x 3 (treatment 2) = 36 libraries

 

Sample

Treatment_1

Treatment_2

S1

NT

ND

S1

NT

D2A

S1

NT

D2B

S1

T1

ND

S1

T1

D2A

S1

T1

D2B

I have a range of questions to ask of the data but most importantly, I want to know how each of the second treatments (the drugs) modifies the effect of the first treatment (the induction of a signalling pathway). I.e. what is the difference between T1-NT with D2A vs. T1-NT with ND.

Would I need to do something special when building the design matrix, i.e. am I looking to create a nested interaction formulae, or could I use a simpler additive matrix then handle the comparison using a range of subtractions when selecting the coefficients?

I currently have something like this:

> Group <- factor(paste(design$T1,design$T2, sep = "_"))

> levels(Group)

[1] "NT_D2B"     "NT_ND"   "NT_D2A" "T1_D2B"    "T1_ND"  "T1_D2A"

> design.mat <- model.matrix(~0+Group+SampleID)

> colnames(design.mat)

[1] "GroupNT_D2B" "GroupNT_ND" "GroupNT_D2A" "GroupT1_D2B" "GroupT1_ND" "GroupT1_D2A" "SampleID2" "SampleID3" "SampleID4" "SampleID5" "SampleID6"
 

Then make my contrasts (just drug D2A shown):

> cont.matrix <- makeContrasts(levels = design.mat,

                            standard.T1.vs.NT = GroupT1_ND-GroupNT_ND,

                            D2A.T1.vs.NT = GroupT1_D2A-GroupNT_D2A,

                            T1.diff.D2A.vs.standard = ((GroupT1_D2A-GroupNT_D2A)-(GroupT1_ND-GroupNT_ND)))


 

Does this look like a reasonable approach considering the biological question “how is the induced pathway affected by treatment with the drug?”

 

Kind regards,

 

Donny

edger edger main and interaction effects glmfit • 814 views
ADD COMMENT
2
Entering edit mode
Aaron Lun ★ 28k
@alun
Last seen 7 hours ago
The city by the bay

Your current design matrix and contrasts seem sensible to me. The only thing I would suggest is to use the glmQLFit and glmQLFTest framework, rather than glmFit and glmLRT; see this paper for more details.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 713 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6