unwrapdups for duplicate spots on custom array
1
0
Entering edit mode
@steffen-neumann-1640
Last seen 6.7 years ago
Germany
[This is a repost of a message sent 20hrs ago, which didn't appear on the list -- apologies if you received this twice.] Hi, I am currently working on the analysis of the SGED Study 073, which has been performed with the potato_10K_v3_sep14_2004 chip, http://www.tigr.org/tdb/potato/microarray_desc.shtml I found that the pattern for replicated spots is non-trivial, duplicates are within a block, but with the upper-left spots duplicated in the lower right of a block, and lower left spots replicated on the upper right. The spacing is 220 for spots in the rectangle (1,1) through (13,18) and 455 for spots in (14,1) to (26,8). A plot of the pairs is available at msbi.ipb-halle.de/~sneumann/lines.pdf I'd like to use calculate the duplicateCorrelation and do an lmFit. Should I 1) hack unwrapdups to understand this/any layout 2) hack/rearrange the inputfiles, possibly with side-effects for the normalization (?!) 3) Do something completely different ? Checking the Archive I found very few references to duplicates which are not "columns" , "rows" or "topbottom". Did I miss something ? Yours, Steffen
Normalization Normalization • 878 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Naomi Altman ★ 6.0k
@naomi-altman-380
Last seen 3.0 years ago
United States
What I would do is to normalize the data and then sort by geneid. Once it is sorted, you can used spacing=1. Does this make sense? It depends on whether the correlation is related to distance (bad) or just to array (OK). --Naomi At 09:36 AM 3/8/2006, Steffen Neumann wrote: >[This is a repost of a message sent 20hrs ago, which didn't appear > on the list -- apologies if you received this twice.] > >Hi, > >I am currently working on the analysis of the SGED Study 073, >which has been performed with the potato_10K_v3_sep14_2004 chip, >http://www.tigr.org/tdb/potato/microarray_desc.shtml > >I found that the pattern for replicated spots is non-trivial, >duplicates are within a block, but with the upper-left spots >duplicated in the lower right of a block, and lower left spots >replicated on the upper right. > >The spacing is 220 for spots in the rectangle (1,1) through (13,18) >and 455 for spots in (14,1) to (26,8). A plot of the pairs >is available at msbi.ipb-halle.de/~sneumann/lines.pdf > >I'd like to use calculate the duplicateCorrelation and do an lmFit. > >Should I > 1) hack unwrapdups to understand this/any layout > 2) hack/rearrange the inputfiles, possibly with side-effects > for the normalization (?!) > 3) Do something completely different ? > >Checking the Archive I found very few references to duplicates >which are not "columns" , "rows" or "topbottom". Did I miss something ? > >Yours, >Steffen > >_______________________________________________ >Bioconductor mailing list >Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor Naomi S. Altman 814-865-3791 (voice) Associate Professor Dept. of Statistics 814-863-7114 (fax) Penn State University 814-865-1348 (Statistics) University Park, PA 16802-2111
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 15:40 -0500, Naomi Altman wrote: > What I would do is to normalize the data and then sort by geneid. > Once it is sorted, you can used spacing=1. Yup, that did it. > Does this make sense? It depends on whether the correlation is > related to distance (bad) or just to array (OK). Thanks, yours, Steffen
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1059 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6