Question: Compiling RMAGEML 2.5.3 or 2.4.0 under Mac OS X 10.4.5 fails
0
13.5 years ago by
Marc Saric70
Marc Saric70 wrote:
Hi list, as the subject states, I tried to compile RMAGEML (the latest source package from Bioconductor (2.4.0) as well as the latest (linux, but also source) package from the homepage of the authors (2.5.3) on my PowerMac G5 OS X 10.4.5 with JDK 1.4.2 and JDK 1.5.0 rev 3 (both provided by Apple, default JDK in use is 1.5.0). I have set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the correct dir, unpacked the archive and uncommented the Mac OS entries in ~/src/Makevars.perm so that # for macosx of 3/05 # PKG_CPPFLAGS=-I/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Headers PKG_LIBS=-framework JavaVM applies, and I don't get the obvious Java compilation errors any more, but now I get the following error. dragonfish-g5:~/transfer/anwend/bioconductor/RMAGEML saric$R CMD INSTALL RMAGEML_2.5.3 * Installing *source* package 'RMAGEML' ... configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating src/Makevars ** libs gcc-3.3 -bundle -flat_namespace -undefined suppress -L/usr/local/lib -o RMAGEML.so rmageml.o -framework JavaVM -lcc_dynamic -F/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/.. -framework R ld: can't locate file for: -lcc_dynamic make: *** [RMAGEML.so] Error 1 ERROR: compilation failed for package 'RMAGEML' ** Removing '/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.2/Resources/library/RMAGEM L' dragonfish-g5:~/transfer/anwend/bioconductor/RMAGEML saric$ I have no clue what -lcc_dynamic should be, so if someone could help me here... Thanks in advance. -- Bye, Marc Saric
rmageml • 573 views
modified 13.5 years ago • written 13.5 years ago by Marc Saric70
Answer: Compiling RMAGEML 2.5.3 or 2.4.0 under Mac OS X 10.4.5 fails
0
13.5 years ago by
Marc Saric70
Marc Saric70 wrote:
Hi list, Sorry for bugging you too early with this, has been a compiler- problem, which could be solved with sudo gcc_select 3.3 afterwards at least the compilation of RMAGEML 2.5.3 worked. I will keep yelling for help if things don't work later on. ;-) Sorry again. -- Bye, Marc Saric