Limma 2.9.10: "Amean" missing
1
0
Entering edit mode
@gordon-smyth
Last seen 2 hours ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia
Dear Julien, The component 'Amean' in the output from lmFit() is supposed to hold the mean log-intensity for each probe, an indicator of the overall expression level of the corresponding transcript. However, if the data values input to lmFit() are log-ratios rather than log-intensities, then there is no way to compute the mean log-intensities. If the first argument to lmFit() is a matrix, as it is in your simulation, then there is no way for the function to determine whether the input values are log-ratios or log-intensities. If they are log-ratios, then calculating Amean would be meaningless. Rather than risk computing a meaningless value, I stopped lmFit() from computing Amean in this situtation. If the first argument to lmFit() is an MAList or exprSet or ExpressionSet then Amean is computed. It is actually not clear that this is right behaviour in the case of an ExpressionSet, but that's how it is for now. Best wishes Gordon >Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:37:51 +0100 >From: Julien Gagneur <julien.gagneur at="" embl.de=""> >Subject: [BioC] Limma 2.9.10: "Amean" missing >To: bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >Message-ID: <45D4541F.5020302 at embl.de> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >Hi, > >I miss the Amean field in the output of eBayes() in limma 2.9.10 . > >It is there in limma 2.8.1 > >sample code: > ># Simulate gene expression data, ># 6 microarrays and 100 genes with one gene differentially expressed >set.seed(2004); invisible(runif(100)) >M <- matrix(rnorm(100*6,sd=0.3),100,6) >M[1,] <- M[1,] + 1 >fit <- lmFit(M) > ># Ordinary t-statistic >par(mfrow=c(1,2)) >ordinary.t <- fit$coef / fit$stdev.unscaled / fit$sigma >qqt(ordinary.t,df=fit$df.residual,main="Ordinary t") >abline(0,1) > ># Moderated t-statistic >eb <- eBayes(fit) > > ># this returns FALSE with limma 2.9.10, TRUE with limma 2.8.1 >"Amean" %in% names(eb) > > > >I run R 2.4.1. Do you experience the same? > >Thanks, >Julien. > >-- >Julien Gagneur >EMBL/HTFG Center >Tel: +49-(0)6221-387-8433 >Fax: +49-(0)6221-387-8166 >Email: julien.gagneur at embl.de > >Room 62 >Meyerhofstrasse 1 >D-69117 Heidelberg >Germany
probe limma probe limma • 1.2k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@julien-gagneur-2045
Last seen 9.6 years ago
Thank you Gordon to clarify this point. In my context I am using it to extract mean log ratios, which I can get by other "means" :-) anyway. I understand that it would be a safer way to proceed. Best, Julien. Gordon Smyth wrote: > Dear Julien, > > The component 'Amean' in the output from lmFit() is supposed to hold the > mean log-intensity for each probe, an indicator of the overall > expression level of the corresponding transcript. > > However, if the data values input to lmFit() are log-ratios rather than > log-intensities, then there is no way to compute the mean > log-intensities. If the first argument to lmFit() is a matrix, as it is > in your simulation, then there is no way for the function to determine > whether the input values are log-ratios or log-intensities. If they are > log-ratios, then calculating Amean would be meaningless. Rather than > risk computing a meaningless value, I stopped lmFit() from computing > Amean in this situtation. > > If the first argument to lmFit() is an MAList or exprSet or > ExpressionSet then Amean is computed. It is actually not clear that this > is right behaviour in the case of an ExpressionSet, but that's how it is > for now. > > Best wishes > Gordon > >> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:37:51 +0100 >> From: Julien Gagneur <julien.gagneur at="" embl.de=""> >> Subject: [BioC] Limma 2.9.10: "Amean" missing >> To: bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >> Message-ID: <45D4541F.5020302 at embl.de> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >> Hi, >> >> I miss the Amean field in the output of eBayes() in limma 2.9.10 . >> >> It is there in limma 2.8.1 >> >> sample code: >> >> # Simulate gene expression data, >> # 6 microarrays and 100 genes with one gene differentially expressed >> set.seed(2004); invisible(runif(100)) >> M <- matrix(rnorm(100*6,sd=0.3),100,6) >> M[1,] <- M[1,] + 1 >> fit <- lmFit(M) >> >> # Ordinary t-statistic >> par(mfrow=c(1,2)) >> ordinary.t <- fit$coef / fit$stdev.unscaled / fit$sigma >> qqt(ordinary.t,df=fit$df.residual,main="Ordinary t") >> abline(0,1) >> >> # Moderated t-statistic >> eb <- eBayes(fit) >> >> >> # this returns FALSE with limma 2.9.10, TRUE with limma 2.8.1 >> "Amean" %in% names(eb) >> >> >> >> I run R 2.4.1. Do you experience the same? >> >> Thanks, >> Julien. >> >> -- >> Julien Gagneur >> EMBL/HTFG Center >> Tel: +49-(0)6221-387-8433 >> Fax: +49-(0)6221-387-8166 >> Email: julien.gagneur at embl.de >> >> Room 62 >> Meyerhofstrasse 1 >> D-69117 Heidelberg >> Germany > -- Julien Gagneur EMBL/HTFG Center Tel: +49-(0)6221-387-8433 Fax: +49-(0)6221-387-8166 Email: julien.gagneur at embl.de Room 62 Meyerhofstrasse 1 D-69117 Heidelberg Germany
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 547 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6