Illumina Beadarray negative data
1
0
Entering edit mode
affy snp ▴ 640
@affy-snp-2480
Last seen 9.6 years ago
Hi, I am analyzing two Illumina Beadarray samples and there is around 34% probesets which are of negative expression values. Which package, like lumi or BeadArray or else could be more suitable to normalize the data? Thanks a lot! Sincerely, Allen
beadarray lumi beadarray lumi • 1.4k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@sean-davis-490
Last seen 3 months ago
United States
On Nov 9, 2007 11:02 AM, affy snp <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I checked with our microarray > facility folks and they told me that they did background > subtraction and then normalized the data in BeadStudio. > Should we also skip the background subtraction step? The negative values are generated by the normalization step, I believe. So, you can do background subtraction or not. The choice to opt out of background correction is relatively new in BeadStudio, I think, so I do not have a systematic answer as to whether or not it is warranted to use BeadStudio background subtraction or not. Perhaps others will have strong opinions one way or the other. Sean
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
You will get negative expression values if your data are global background corrected. Our microarray facility core creates two types of datasets: (1) Not background corrected and normalized and (2) background corrected and normalized. Background values can be seen in the probe control profile output from BeadStudio. Wei > On Nov 9, 2007 11:02 AM, affy snp <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: >> Hi Sean, >> >> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I checked with our microarray >> facility folks and they told me that they did background >> subtraction and then normalized the data in BeadStudio. >> Should we also skip the background subtraction step? > > The negative values are generated by the normalization step, I > believe. So, you can do background subtraction or not. The choice to > opt out of background correction is relatively new in BeadStudio, I > think, so I do not have a systematic answer as to whether or not it is > warranted to use BeadStudio background subtraction or not. Perhaps > others will have strong opinions one way or the other. > > Sean > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
Dear Wei, Thanks a lot for the notes. We have also figured out by the help of Illumina experts that the negative expression values were generated by background subtraction. Our facility used the BeadStudio to do background subtraction and normalization steps. The only concern I have is that we often see, for a probset, it perhaps has positive value for control sample while negative value for the test sample, or the opposite. For this scenario, I do not know how to deal with. Have you also done the analysis starting with the dataset1 you mentioned? Will that make a difference? We will also obtain the raw dataset without background subtraction and see how it will look like. Thanks once again! Allen On Nov 11, 2007 7:13 AM, Wei Shi <shi at="" wehi.edu.au=""> wrote: > You will get negative expression values if your data are global background > corrected. Our microarray facility core creates two types of datasets: (1) > Not background corrected and normalized and (2) background corrected and > normalized. Background values can be seen in the probe control profile > output from BeadStudio. > > Wei > > > > On Nov 9, 2007 11:02 AM, affy snp <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > >> Hi Sean, > >> > >> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I checked with our microarray > >> facility folks and they told me that they did background > >> subtraction and then normalized the data in BeadStudio. > >> Should we also skip the background subtraction step? > > > > The negative values are generated by the normalization step, I > > believe. So, you can do background subtraction or not. The choice to > > opt out of background correction is relatively new in BeadStudio, I > > think, so I do not have a systematic answer as to whether or not it is > > warranted to use BeadStudio background subtraction or not. Perhaps > > others will have strong opinions one way or the other. > > > > Sean > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Bioconductor mailing list > > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > > Search the archives: > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > > > > >
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
Dear Allen: We always work on the data set which are not background corrected and normalized. There are no negative expression values in this data set. Cheers, Wei affy snp wrote: > Dear Wei, > > Thanks a lot for the notes. We have also figured out by the help > of Illumina experts that the negative expression values were generated > by background subtraction. > > Our facility used the BeadStudio to do background subtraction and > normalization steps. The only concern I have is that we often see, > for a probset, it perhaps has positive value for control sample while > negative value for the test sample, or the opposite. For this scenario, > I do not know how to deal with. > > Have you also done the analysis starting with the dataset1 you mentioned? > Will that make a difference? > > We will also obtain the raw dataset without background subtraction and > see how it will look like. > > Thanks once again! > > Allen > > On Nov 11, 2007 7:13 AM, Wei Shi <shi at="" wehi.edu.au=""> wrote: > >> You will get negative expression values if your data are global background >> corrected. Our microarray facility core creates two types of datasets: (1) >> Not background corrected and normalized and (2) background corrected and >> normalized. Background values can be seen in the probe control profile >> output from BeadStudio. >> >> Wei >> >> >> >>> On Nov 9, 2007 11:02 AM, affy snp <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Sean, >>>> >>>> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I checked with our microarray >>>> facility folks and they told me that they did background >>>> subtraction and then normalized the data in BeadStudio. >>>> Should we also skip the background subtraction step? >>>> >>> The negative values are generated by the normalization step, I >>> believe. So, you can do background subtraction or not. The choice to >>> opt out of background correction is relatively new in BeadStudio, I >>> think, so I do not have a systematic answer as to whether or not it is >>> warranted to use BeadStudio background subtraction or not. Perhaps >>> others will have strong opinions one way or the other. >>> >>> Sean >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bioconductor mailing list >>> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >>> Search the archives: >>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >>> >>> >> >>
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
Thanks Wei. Fairly enough. I guess I will run to our microarray facility tomorrow to request the slides re-scanned. BTW, I guess you are using Lumi or Beadarray for normalization step? Regards, Allen On Nov 11, 2007 5:28 PM, Wei Shi <shi at="" wehi.edu.au=""> wrote: > Dear Allen: > > We always work on the data set which are not background corrected > and normalized. There are no negative expression values in this data set. > > Cheers, > Wei > > > affy snp wrote: > > Dear Wei, > > > > Thanks a lot for the notes. We have also figured out by the help > > of Illumina experts that the negative expression values were generated > > by background subtraction. > > > > Our facility used the BeadStudio to do background subtraction and > > normalization steps. The only concern I have is that we often see, > > for a probset, it perhaps has positive value for control sample while > > negative value for the test sample, or the opposite. For this scenario, > > I do not know how to deal with. > > > > Have you also done the analysis starting with the dataset1 you mentioned? > > Will that make a difference? > > > > We will also obtain the raw dataset without background subtraction and > > see how it will look like. > > > > Thanks once again! > > > > Allen > > > > On Nov 11, 2007 7:13 AM, Wei Shi <shi at="" wehi.edu.au=""> wrote: > > > >> You will get negative expression values if your data are global background > >> corrected. Our microarray facility core creates two types of datasets: (1) > >> Not background corrected and normalized and (2) background corrected and > >> normalized. Background values can be seen in the probe control profile > >> output from BeadStudio. > >> > >> Wei > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Nov 9, 2007 11:02 AM, affy snp <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Sean, > >>>> > >>>> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I checked with our microarray > >>>> facility folks and they told me that they did background > >>>> subtraction and then normalized the data in BeadStudio. > >>>> Should we also skip the background subtraction step? > >>>> > >>> The negative values are generated by the normalization step, I > >>> believe. So, you can do background subtraction or not. The choice to > >>> opt out of background correction is relatively new in BeadStudio, I > >>> think, so I do not have a systematic answer as to whether or not it is > >>> warranted to use BeadStudio background subtraction or not. Perhaps > >>> others will have strong opinions one way or the other. > >>> > >>> Sean > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Bioconductor mailing list > >>> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > >>> Search the archives: > >>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
Yes, we are using Lumi VST to do the data transformation at this stage. Good luck, Wei affy snp wrote: > Thanks Wei. Fairly enough. I guess I will run to our microarray facility > tomorrow to request the slides re-scanned. BTW, I guess you are using > Lumi or Beadarray for normalization step? > > Regards, > Allen > > On Nov 11, 2007 5:28 PM, Wei Shi <shi at="" wehi.edu.au=""> wrote: > >> Dear Allen: >> >> We always work on the data set which are not background corrected >> and normalized. There are no negative expression values in this data set. >> >> Cheers, >> Wei >> >> >> affy snp wrote: >> >>> Dear Wei, >>> >>> Thanks a lot for the notes. We have also figured out by the help >>> of Illumina experts that the negative expression values were generated >>> by background subtraction. >>> >>> Our facility used the BeadStudio to do background subtraction and >>> normalization steps. The only concern I have is that we often see, >>> for a probset, it perhaps has positive value for control sample while >>> negative value for the test sample, or the opposite. For this scenario, >>> I do not know how to deal with. >>> >>> Have you also done the analysis starting with the dataset1 you mentioned? >>> Will that make a difference? >>> >>> We will also obtain the raw dataset without background subtraction and >>> see how it will look like. >>> >>> Thanks once again! >>> >>> Allen >>> >>> On Nov 11, 2007 7:13 AM, Wei Shi <shi at="" wehi.edu.au=""> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> You will get negative expression values if your data are global background >>>> corrected. Our microarray facility core creates two types of datasets: (1) >>>> Not background corrected and normalized and (2) background corrected and >>>> normalized. Background values can be seen in the probe control profile >>>> output from BeadStudio. >>>> >>>> Wei >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Nov 9, 2007 11:02 AM, affy snp <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Sean, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I checked with our microarray >>>>>> facility folks and they told me that they did background >>>>>> subtraction and then normalized the data in BeadStudio. >>>>>> Should we also skip the background subtraction step? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> The negative values are generated by the normalization step, I >>>>> believe. So, you can do background subtraction or not. The choice to >>>>> opt out of background correction is relatively new in BeadStudio, I >>>>> think, so I do not have a systematic answer as to whether or not it is >>>>> warranted to use BeadStudio background subtraction or not. Perhaps >>>>> others will have strong opinions one way or the other. >>>>> >>>>> Sean >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Bioconductor mailing list >>>>> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >>>>> Search the archives: >>>>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1026 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6