Question: Question about Package EBarrays
0
gravatar for affy snp
11.4 years ago by
affy snp640
affy snp640 wrote:
Dear list, Hi! I have a question about EBarrays. It seems to me that EBarrays requires the array data not be transformed. The data called 'gould' has been used as an example in the vignette. And by looking at first few data it could support my guess. > gould[1:4,1:4] CopK759 WFK759 WFK842.12 CopN9CK758.1 S80456.s.at 336.691 281.002 360.969 258.360 S82229.s.at 1461.250 1312.740 857.921 1559.740 U01022.s.at 1057.500 668.640 879.656 885.964 U02553cds.s.at 896.886 1207.350 1302.750 1302.970 Am I correct? Thank you! Allen [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ebarrays • 389 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 11.4 years ago by Sean Davis21k • written 11.4 years ago by affy snp640
Answer: Question about Package EBarrays
0
gravatar for Sean Davis
11.4 years ago by
Sean Davis21k
United States
Sean Davis21k wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 7:59 PM, ss <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > Dear list, > > Hi! I have a question about EBarrays. It seems to me that EBarrays requires > the array data not > be transformed. The data called 'gould' has been used as an example in the > vignette. And by > looking at first few data it could support my guess. > >> gould[1:4,1:4] > CopK759 WFK759 WFK842.12 CopN9CK758.1 > S80456.s.at 336.691 281.002 360.969 258.360 > S82229.s.at 1461.250 1312.740 857.921 1559.740 > U01022.s.at 1057.500 668.640 879.656 885.964 > U02553cds.s.at 896.886 1207.350 1302.750 1302.970 > > Am I correct? Hi, Allen. Your best bet is to read all the documentation thoroughly. For example, look at the second sentence of section 2 of the vignette from which you are taking your example. It suggests that your guess is incorrect. Sean
ADD COMMENTlink written 11.4 years ago by Sean Davis21k
Answer: Question about Package EBarrays
0
gravatar for Sean Davis
11.4 years ago by
Sean Davis21k
United States
Sean Davis21k wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:44 AM, ss <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Thanks! Yeah, I got that. It says "...these xji are recorded on the original > measurement > scale or that they have been log-transformed". But one of the authors of > EBarrays, Dr. > Michael Newton replied (see below) and agree what I said. I will double > check. Hi, Allen and Michael. I stand corrected. Sorry for the misinformation! Sean > On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Michael Newton <newton at="" biostat.wisc.edu=""> > wrote: > > That's right... > -Michael N. > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Sean Davis <sdavis2 at="" mail.nih.gov=""> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 7:59 PM, ss <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: >> > Dear list, >> > >> > Hi! I have a question about EBarrays. It seems to me that EBarrays >> > requires >> > the array data not >> > be transformed. The data called 'gould' has been used as an example in >> > the >> > vignette. And by >> > looking at first few data it could support my guess. >> > >> >> gould[1:4,1:4] >> > CopK759 WFK759 WFK842.12 CopN9CK758.1 >> > S80456.s.at 336.691 281.002 360.969 258.360 >> > S82229.s.at 1461.250 1312.740 857.921 1559.740 >> > U01022.s.at 1057.500 668.640 879.656 885.964 >> > U02553cds.s.at 896.886 1207.350 1302.750 1302.970 >> > >> > Am I correct? >> >> Hi, Allen. Your best bet is to read all the documentation thoroughly. >> For example, look at the second sentence of section 2 of the vignette >> from which you are taking your example. It suggests that your guess >> is incorrect. >> >> Sean > >
ADD COMMENTlink written 11.4 years ago by Sean Davis21k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 16.09
Traffic: 300 users visited in the last hour