11.1 years ago by
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:44 AM, ss <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote:
> Hi Sean,
> Thanks! Yeah, I got that. It says "...these xji are recorded on the
> scale or that they have been log-transformed". But one of the
> EBarrays, Dr.
> Michael Newton replied (see below) and agree what I said. I will
Hi, Allen and Michael.
I stand corrected. Sorry for the misinformation!
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Michael Newton <newton at="" biostat.wisc.edu="">
> That's right...
> -Michael N.
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Sean Davis <sdavis2 at="" mail.nih.gov="">
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 7:59 PM, ss <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote:
>> > Dear list,
>> > Hi! I have a question about EBarrays. It seems to me that
>> > requires
>> > the array data not
>> > be transformed. The data called 'gould' has been used as an
>> > the
>> > vignette. And by
>> > looking at first few data it could support my guess.
>> >> gould[1:4,1:4]
>> > CopK759 WFK759 WFK842.12 CopN9CK758.1
>> > S80456.s.at 336.691 281.002 360.969 258.360
>> > S82229.s.at 1461.250 1312.740 857.921 1559.740
>> > U01022.s.at 1057.500 668.640 879.656 885.964
>> > U02553cds.s.at 896.886 1207.350 1302.750 1302.970
>> > Am I correct?
>> Hi, Allen. Your best bet is to read all the documentation
>> For example, look at the second sentence of section 2 of the
>> from which you are taking your example. It suggests that your
>> is incorrect.