Standard error in summarization ExpressionSets
1
0
Entering edit mode
@rodrigo-santamaria-vicente-2844
Last seen 9.6 years ago
Hi there!, After performing normalization-summarization with any of the available functions (rma, mas5, plier, etc.), I get an ExpressionSet class. It inherits from eSet class, but it seems to loss the se.exprs() method to get the standard errors for the summarized expression levels. My question is: how could I get the standard errors from the ExpressionSet returned by rma, mas5 or any other method? if these methods do not return standard errors, why? are them unimportant? is there any method that computes them? Thanks in advance! Rodrigo
plier plier • 956 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@james-w-macdonald-5106
Last seen 13 hours ago
United States
Hi Rodrigo, Rodrigo Santamar?a Vicente wrote: > Hi there!, > After performing normalization-summarization with any of the available > functions (rma, mas5, plier, etc.), I get an ExpressionSet class. It > inherits from eSet class, but it seems to loss the se.exprs() method to > get the standard errors for the summarized expression levels. > My question is: how could I get the standard errors from the > ExpressionSet returned by rma, mas5 or any other method? if these > methods do not return standard errors, why? are them unimportant? is > there any method that computes them? None of the methods you mention return standard errors. If you want standard errors, you might use the affyPLM package. For instance the fitPLM() function will return values very similar to rma(), but with standard errors. Best, Jim > > Thanks in advance! > Rodrigo > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor -- James W. MacDonald, M.S. Biostatistician Affymetrix and cDNA Microarray Core University of Michigan Cancer Center 1500 E. Medical Center Drive 7410 CCGC Ann Arbor MI 48109 734-647-5623
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Hi Rodrigo I think the se.exprs() method disappeared a release or two ago. You can still get this data by using: assayDataElement(eset, "se.exprs") There are a few methods that I am aware of that give standard errors. In addition to fitPLM(), I believe you can also get standard errors from RMA using: expresso(affybatch, bgcorrect.method="rma" , normalize.method="quantiles", pmcorrect.method="pmonly" , summary.method="medianpolish") Also, MBEI (Li and Wong) will give standard errors: expresso(affybatch , normalize.method="invariantset", bg.correct=FALSE , pmcorrect.method="pmonly", summary.method="liwong") ) My personal recommendation for getting standard errors would be to use mmgmos() from the package puma (though I might be biased :-) You could also look at the function bgx() in the package of the same name HTH Richard. James W. MacDonald wrote: > Hi Rodrigo, > > Rodrigo Santamar?a Vicente wrote: >> Hi there!, >> After performing normalization-summarization with any of the available >> functions (rma, mas5, plier, etc.), I get an ExpressionSet class. It >> inherits from eSet class, but it seems to loss the se.exprs() method >> to get the standard errors for the summarized expression levels. >> My question is: how could I get the standard errors from the >> ExpressionSet returned by rma, mas5 or any other method? if these >> methods do not return standard errors, why? are them unimportant? is >> there any method that computes them? > > None of the methods you mention return standard errors. If you want > standard errors, you might use the affyPLM package. For instance the > fitPLM() function will return values very similar to rma(), but with > standard errors. > > Best, > > Jim > > >> >> Thanks in advance! >> Rodrigo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioconductor mailing list >> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >> Search the archives: >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > -- Richard D. Pearson richard.pearson at postgrad.manchester.ac.uk School of Computer Science, http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~pearsonr University of Manchester, Tel: +44 161 275 6178 Oxford Road, Mob: +44 7971 221181 Manchester M13 9PL, UK. Fax: +44 161 275 6204
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
Richard Pearson wrote: > Hi Rodrigo > > I think the se.exprs() method disappeared a release or two ago. You can > still get this data by using: > > assayDataElement(eset, "se.exprs") also assayData(eset)[["se.exprs"]], which might have a more familiar feel to it. Both return NULL when se.exprs is not present. Martin > > There are a few methods that I am aware of that give standard errors. In > addition to fitPLM(), I believe you can also get standard errors from > RMA using: > > expresso(affybatch, bgcorrect.method="rma" > , normalize.method="quantiles", pmcorrect.method="pmonly" > , summary.method="medianpolish") > > Also, MBEI (Li and Wong) will give standard errors: > > expresso(affybatch > , normalize.method="invariantset", bg.correct=FALSE > , pmcorrect.method="pmonly", summary.method="liwong") > ) > > My personal recommendation for getting standard errors would be to use > mmgmos() from the package puma (though I might be biased :-) > > You could also look at the function bgx() in the package of the same name > > HTH > > Richard. > > > James W. MacDonald wrote: >> Hi Rodrigo, >> >> Rodrigo Santamar?a Vicente wrote: >>> Hi there!, >>> After performing normalization-summarization with any of the >>> available functions (rma, mas5, plier, etc.), I get an ExpressionSet >>> class. It inherits from eSet class, but it seems to loss the >>> se.exprs() method to get the standard errors for the summarized >>> expression levels. >>> My question is: how could I get the standard errors from the >>> ExpressionSet returned by rma, mas5 or any other method? if these >>> methods do not return standard errors, why? are them unimportant? is >>> there any method that computes them? >> >> None of the methods you mention return standard errors. If you want >> standard errors, you might use the affyPLM package. For instance the >> fitPLM() function will return values very similar to rma(), but with >> standard errors. >> >> Best, >> >> Jim >> >> >>> >>> Thanks in advance! >>> Rodrigo >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bioconductor mailing list >>> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >>> Search the archives: >>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >> > -- Martin Morgan Computational Biology / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N. PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109 Location: Arnold Building M2 B169 Phone: (206) 667-2793
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 948 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6