Affymetrix preprocessing, MAS5 vs. RMA
2
0
Entering edit mode
@dozmorov-mikhail-g-hsc-2790
Last seen 9.6 years ago
Hello, I'm learning basics of importing Affy's .cel files to R, and do it with affy library: R> Data <- ReadAffy() When I do preprocessing R> eset <- rma(Data) OR eset <- mas5(Data) I'm getting very different expression values. From MAS5: ID 21.CEL 33.CEL 36.CEL 1415670_at 2494.54 2576.29 2240.92 1415671_at 6292.17 5013.13 3075.89 1415672_at 6727.66 5858.31 5690.70 1415673_at 567.38 718.02 875.25 From RMA, Antilogged from Log2 ID 21.CEL 33.CEL 36.CEL 1415670_at 74.16 69.30 59.08 1415671_at 191.52 171.38 94.30 1415672_at 194.18 199.57 175.13 1415673_at 14.93 13.16 21.50 Can't find any explanation why it could happen. And what to use? Please, advice! Thank you. Mikhail.
affy affy • 2.1k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@sean-davis-490
Last seen 3 months ago
United States
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Dozmorov, Mikhail G. (HSC) < Mikhail-Dozmorov@ouhsc.edu> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm learning basics of importing Affy's .cel files to R, and do it with > affy library: > R> Data <- ReadAffy() > When I do preprocessing > R> eset <- rma(Data) OR eset <- mas5(Data) > I'm getting very different expression values. > From MAS5: > ID 21.CEL 33.CEL 36.CEL > 1415670_at 2494.54 2576.29 2240.92 > 1415671_at 6292.17 5013.13 3075.89 > 1415672_at 6727.66 5858.31 5690.70 > 1415673_at 567.38 718.02 875.25 > From RMA, Antilogged from Log2 > ID 21.CEL 33.CEL 36.CEL > 1415670_at 74.16 69.30 59.08 > 1415671_at 191.52 171.38 94.30 > 1415672_at 194.18 199.57 175.13 > 1415673_at 14.93 13.16 21.50 > > Can't find any explanation why it could happen. And what to use? Please, > advice! Thank you. Mikhail. > Each normalization method is indeed different. They should and will produce different results. There is an extensive literature on different methods of normalization and preprocessing for Affy that you can read to get the details. I would say that most people would not use MAS5 anymore. RMA is a good alternative. Sean [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
On Jan 22, 2009, at 13:00 , Sean Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Dozmorov, Mikhail G. (HSC) < > Mikhail-Dozmorov at ouhsc.edu> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm learning basics of importing Affy's .cel files to R, and do it >> with >> affy library: >> R> Data <- ReadAffy() >> When I do preprocessing >> R> eset <- rma(Data) OR eset <- mas5(Data) >> I'm getting very different expression values. >> From MAS5: >> ID 21.CEL 33.CEL 36.CEL >> 1415670_at 2494.54 2576.29 2240.92 >> 1415671_at 6292.17 5013.13 3075.89 >> 1415672_at 6727.66 5858.31 5690.70 >> 1415673_at 567.38 718.02 875.25 >> From RMA, Antilogged from Log2 >> ID 21.CEL 33.CEL 36.CEL >> 1415670_at 74.16 69.30 59.08 >> 1415671_at 191.52 171.38 94.30 >> 1415672_at 194.18 199.57 175.13 >> 1415673_at 14.93 13.16 21.50 >> >> Can't find any explanation why it could happen. And what to use? >> Please, >> advice! Thank you. Mikhail. >> > > Each normalization method is indeed different. They should and will > produce > different results. There is an extensive literature on different > methods of > normalization and preprocessing for Affy that you can read to get the > details. > > I would say that most people would not use MAS5 anymore. RMA is a > good > alternative. Also note that the actual numbers are meaningless. What you should compare is the (log) fold change between conditions. The actual scale has no meaning. Kasper
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
Daniel Brewer ★ 1.9k
@daniel-brewer-1791
Last seen 9.6 years ago
I believe that RMA produces expression levels that have been log2'ed whilst MAS5 does not. Even so you still can't compare the values directly. It is generally thought that MAS5 should be avoided, even Affymetrix recommend PLIER (another algorithm produced by Affy) over MAS5. Dan Dozmorov, Mikhail G. (HSC) wrote: > Hello, > > I'm learning basics of importing Affy's .cel files to R, and do it with affy library: > R> Data <- ReadAffy() > When I do preprocessing > R> eset <- rma(Data) OR eset <- mas5(Data) > I'm getting very different expression values. > From MAS5: > ID 21.CEL 33.CEL 36.CEL > 1415670_at 2494.54 2576.29 2240.92 > 1415671_at 6292.17 5013.13 3075.89 > 1415672_at 6727.66 5858.31 5690.70 > 1415673_at 567.38 718.02 875.25 > From RMA, Antilogged from Log2 > ID 21.CEL 33.CEL 36.CEL > 1415670_at 74.16 69.30 59.08 > 1415671_at 191.52 171.38 94.30 > 1415672_at 194.18 199.57 175.13 > 1415673_at 14.93 13.16 21.50 > > Can't find any explanation why it could happen. And what to use? Please, advice! Thank you. Mikhail. > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor -- ************************************************************** Daniel Brewer, Ph.D. Institute of Cancer Research Molecular Carcinogenesis MUCRC 15 Cotswold Road Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 20 8722 4109 Email: daniel.brewer at icr.ac.uk ************************************************************** The Institute of Cancer Research: Royal Cancer Hospital, a charitable Company Limited by Guarantee, Registered in England under Company No. 534147 with its Registered Office at 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP. This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the a...{{dropped:2}}
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 615 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6