limma: is layout really necessary for non-printtip normalization?
0
0
Entering edit mode
@michael-lawrence-2759
Last seen 7.9 years ago
The "control" and "robustspline" methods in normalizeWithinArrays require the layout to be specified, even though they don't use the layout. Is this by design? I would think "control" and "robustspline" would be consistent with "loess", which doesn't require the layout. Thanks, Michael > sessionInfo() R version 2.10.0 Under development (unstable) (2009-05-01 r48448) x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu locale: [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8 [5] LC_MONETARY=C LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8 [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C attached base packages: [1] grid stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods [8] base other attached packages: [1] Ringo_1.9.3 Matrix_0.999375-26 lattice_0.17-22 limma_2.19.0 [5] RColorBrewer_1.0-2 Biobase_2.5.2 loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] annotate_1.23.0 AnnotationDbi_1.7.0 DBI_0.2-4 [4] genefilter_1.25.1 RSQLite_0.7-1 splines_2.10.0 [7] survival_2.35-4 tools_2.10.0 xtable_1.5-5 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
• 473 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 377 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6