Yes. That was my original thought too. I was wondering whether there is a more straight forward method. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Michael Lawrence < lawrence.michael@gene.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Cheng-Yuan Kao <neokao@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I did check inparanoid before. My impression is that inparanoid only does >> two species comparison although they seem to have all the species we need. >> Any thoughts? >> >> > Aren't the pairwise homologies enough? You could just look for complete > cliques in the graph formed from the pairwise homologies that contain all 5 > species of interest, but not the other three. > > Or am I missing something? > > Michael > >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Michael Lawrence < >> lawrence.michael@gene.com> wrote: >> >>> Take a look at the inparanoid annotation packages. May or may not have >>> all the species you need. >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Cheng-Yuan Kao <neokao@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, there, >>>> >>>> We are trying to identify genes conserved in 5 eukaryotic species but >>>> not in >>>> 3 other eukaryotic species. >>>> Is there a way to do it with some websites? >>>> >>>> Or is there a program from somewhere or a package from Bioconductor >>>> tailored >>>> for this? >>>> >>>> >>>> Your suggestions will be appreciated. >>>> >>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Bioconductor mailing list >>>> Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >>>> Search the archives: >>>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >>>> >>> >>> >> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]