Help expanding limmaUsersGuide section 8.7 to 3x2 factorial
0
0
Entering edit mode
Jenny Drnevich ★ 2.0k
@jenny-drnevich-2812
Last seen 20 days ago
United States
Hi everyone, This is probably more of a general stats questions, but I'm using the limmaUsersGuide as my example, so I hope that qualifies for this mailing list. Section 8.7 goes through 3 different parametrizations of a 2x2 factorial design, although they are all mathematically equivalent. I have no trouble showing this with my own data, however I run into trouble when try to expand to a 3x2 factorial and compare the cell-means model (example 1) and the sum-to-zero parametrization (example 3). I'm trying to re-create the same coefficients as the sum-to-zero parametrization using contrasts from the cell-means model, but I'm not getting the right coefficient values and p-values for the coefficients involving the factor with 3 levels. However, I am getting the same values if I calculate the overall F-test or the F-test for the main effect of the factor with 3 levels. I actually need to expand this to a 4x2 factorial, and I'm running both model parametrizations in my analyses depending on the contrasts I need to get (some are easier to get from one model versus the other). I started this little comparison as a sanity check, but now it's driving me insane because I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong! I tried to search the BioC list, the R list and Google, but the question is a little complicated to search and I couldn't find anything useful. Below is my full example code using data from just 2 genes; I attached the FakeData.csv file - hopefully it will come through, but everything is shown in the code below. Would someone please show me what I'm doing wrong? Thank you! Jenny > > library(limma) > > fakeData <- read.csv("FakeData.csv",stringsAsFactors=F) > fakeData Sample Group Pop Trt RNA1 RNA2 1 1 BMAc BMA c 7.023854 6.153886 2 2 BMAc BMA c 7.739991 5.866103 3 3 BMAc BMA c 7.564132 6.638336 4 4 BMAc BMA c 7.270778 6.594744 5 5 BMAe BMA e 6.810056 6.533012 6 6 BMAe BMA e 6.205453 5.442167 7 7 BMAe BMA e 5.676583 6.026147 8 8 BMAe BMA e 6.810335 5.748206 9 9 BVOc BVO c 6.810056 5.816311 10 10 BVOc BVO c 7.516394 6.753504 11 11 BVOc BVO c 8.569809 6.216047 12 12 BVOc BVO c 7.866806 5.781871 13 13 BVOe BVO e 6.617231 5.788481 14 14 BVOe BVO e 7.699425 6.106843 15 15 BVOe BVO e 7.114598 7.175774 16 16 BVOe BVO e 6.491565 5.883128 17 17 BWFc BWF c 7.625755 5.903757 18 18 BWFc BWF c 7.846667 5.939844 19 19 BWFc BWF c 6.629416 5.928577 20 20 BWFc BWF c 7.801253 5.894263 21 21 BWFe BWF e 7.128194 5.842164 22 22 BWFe BWF e 7.217061 7.053346 23 23 BWFe BWF e 7.861897 7.055525 24 24 BWFe BWF e 6.889417 9.774177 25 25 CARc CAR c 8.118041 5.918385 26 26 CARc CAR c 6.178935 5.856860 27 27 CARc CAR c 7.456442 6.035643 28 28 CARc CAR c 7.538999 5.827788 29 29 CARe CAR e 6.980979 6.556491 30 30 CARe CAR e 7.614278 5.875536 31 31 CARe CAR e 5.898541 7.787749 32 32 CARe CAR e 5.947753 6.914975 > > #do sum-to-zero parametrization for half of data (2X2) (3rd example in limmaUsersGuide, section 8.7) > > Pop1 <- factor(fakeData$Pop[1:16]) > Trt1 <- factor(fakeData$Trt[1:16]) > contrasts(Pop1) <- contr.sum(2) > contrasts(Trt1) <- contr.sum(2) > > design1.stz <- model.matrix(~Pop1*Trt1) > design1.stz (Intercept) Pop11 Trt11 Pop11:Trt11 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 -1 -1 6 1 1 -1 -1 7 1 1 -1 -1 8 1 1 -1 -1 9 1 -1 1 -1 10 1 -1 1 -1 11 1 -1 1 -1 12 1 -1 1 -1 13 1 -1 -1 1 14 1 -1 -1 1 15 1 -1 -1 1 16 1 -1 -1 1 attr(,"assign") [1] 0 1 2 3 attr(,"contrasts") attr(,"contrasts")$Pop1 [,1] BMA 1 BVO -1 attr(,"contrasts")$Trt1 [,1] c 1 e -1 > > fit1.stz <- eBayes(lmFit(as.matrix(t(fakeData[1:16,c("RNA1","RNA2")])),design1.stz )) > > > #Now do cell-mean model, again on half the data (1st example in limmaUsersGuide, section 8.7) > > TS1 <- factor(fakeData$Group[1:16]) > design1.cm <- model.matrix(~0+TS1) > colnamesdesign1.cm) <- levels(TS1) > design1.cm BMAc BMAe BVOc BVOe 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 10 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 1 0 12 0 0 1 0 13 0 0 0 1 14 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 0 1 16 0 0 0 1 attr(,"assign") [1] 1 1 1 1 attr(,"contrasts") attr(,"contrasts")$TS1 [1] "contr.treatment" > > #Make contrasts the same as the coefficients of design1.stz > cont.matrix1 <- makeContrasts(Intercept = (BMAc + BMAe + BVOc + BVOe)/4, + Pop11 = (BMAc + BMAe - BVOc - BVOe)/4, + Trt11 = (BMAc - BMAe + BVOc - BVOe)/4, + Pop11.Trt11 = (BMAc - BMAe - BVOc + BVOe)/4, + levels=design1.cm) > > cont.matrix1 Contrasts Levels Intercept Pop11 Trt11 Pop11.Trt11 BMAc 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 BMAe 0.25 0.25 -0.25 -0.25 BVOc 0.25 -0.25 0.25 -0.25 BVOe 0.25 -0.25 -0.25 0.25 > > > fit1.cm <- lmFit(as.matrix(t(fakeData[1:16,c("RNA1","RNA2")])),design1.cm) > fit1.cm2 <- eBayescontrasts.fitfit1.cm,cont.matrix1)) > > #Compare results > fit1.stz$coef (Intercept) Pop11 Trt11 Pop11:Trt11 RNA1 7.111692 -0.22404395 0.43353590 0.07850503 RNA2 6.157785 -0.03245994 0.06981525 0.11812693 > > fit1.cm2$coef Contrasts Intercept Pop11 Trt11 Pop11.Trt11 RNA1 7.111692 -0.22404395 0.43353590 0.07850503 RNA2 6.157785 -0.03245994 0.06981525 0.11812693 > #all the same > > fit1.stz$p.value (Intercept) Pop11 Trt11 Pop11:Trt11 RNA1 0 0.1003890 0.001476679 0.5648199 RNA2 0 0.8118525 0.608670022 0.3863506 > > fit1.cm2$p.value Contrasts Intercept Pop11 Trt11 Pop11.Trt11 RNA1 0 0.1003890 0.001476679 0.5648199 RNA2 0 0.8118525 0.608670022 0.3863506 > #all the same > > #Do overall F-test > topTable(fit1.stz,coef=2:4,sort.by="none") ID Pop11 Trt11 Pop11.Trt11 AveExpr F P.Value adj.P.Val 1 RNA1 -0.22404395 0.43353590 0.07850503 7.111692 4.3794233 0.004346933 0.008693866 2 RNA2 -0.03245994 0.06981525 0.11812693 6.157785 0.3563916 0.784520156 0.784520156 > > topTable(fit1.cm2,coef=2:4,sort.by="none") ID Pop11 Trt11 Pop11.Trt11 AveExpr F P.Value adj.P.Val 1 RNA1 -0.22404395 0.43353590 0.07850503 7.111692 4.3794233 0.004346933 0.008693866 2 RNA2 -0.03245994 0.06981525 0.11812693 6.157785 0.3563916 0.784520156 0.784520156 > > all.equal(topTable(fit1.stz,coef=2:4,sort.by="none"),topTable(fit1.cm2 ,coef=2:4,sort.by="none")) [1] TRUE > > #Ok, so these two model parametrizations give me the exact same results > > > #Now expand to 3x2 factorial and compare models > > Pop2 <- factor(fakeData$Pop[1:24]) > Trt2 <- factor(fakeData$Trt[1:24]) > contrasts(Pop2) <- contr.sum(3) > contrasts(Trt2) <- contr.sum(2) > > design2.stz <- model.matrix(~Pop2*Trt2) > design2.stz (Intercept) Pop21 Pop22 Trt21 Pop21:Trt21 Pop22:Trt21 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 3 1 1 0 1 1 0 4 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 1 1 0 -1 -1 0 6 1 1 0 -1 -1 0 7 1 1 0 -1 -1 0 8 1 1 0 -1 -1 0 9 1 0 1 1 0 1 10 1 0 1 1 0 1 11 1 0 1 1 0 1 12 1 0 1 1 0 1 13 1 0 1 -1 0 -1 14 1 0 1 -1 0 -1 15 1 0 1 -1 0 -1 16 1 0 1 -1 0 -1 17 1 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 18 1 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 19 1 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 20 1 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 21 1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 22 1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 23 1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 24 1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 attr(,"assign") [1] 0 1 1 2 3 3 attr(,"contrasts") attr(,"contrasts")$Pop2 [,1] [,2] BMA 1 0 BVO 0 1 BWF -1 -1 attr(,"contrasts")$Trt2 [,1] c 1 e -1 > > fit2.stz <- eBayes(lmFit(as.matrix(t(fakeData[1:24,c("RNA1","RNA2")])),design2.stz )) > > > TS2 <- factor(fakeData$Group[1:24]) > design2.cm <- model.matrix(~0+TS2) > colnamesdesign2.cm) <- levels(TS2) > design2.cm BMAc BMAe BVOc BVOe BWFc BWFe 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 1 0 0 14 0 0 0 1 0 0 15 0 0 0 1 0 0 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 1 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 19 0 0 0 0 1 0 20 0 0 0 0 1 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 1 22 0 0 0 0 0 1 23 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 0 0 0 0 0 1 attr(,"assign") [1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 attr(,"contrasts") attr(,"contrasts")$TS2 [1] "contr.treatment" > > #Make contrasts the same as the coefficients of design1.stz > #But I'm probably not doing this correctly! > > cont.matrix2 <- makeContrasts(Intercept = (BMAc + BMAe + BVOc + BVOe + BWFc + BWFe)/6, + Pop21 = (BMAc + BMAe - BWFc - BWFe)/4, + Pop22 = (BVOc + BVOe - BWFc - BWFe)/4, + Trt21 = (BMAc - BMAe + BVOc - BVOe + BWFc - BWFe)/6, + Pop21.Trt21 = (BMAc - BMAe - BWFc + BWFe)/4, + Pop22.Trt21 = (BVOc - BVOe - BWFc + BWFe)/4, + levels=design2.cm) > > cont.matrix2 Contrasts Levels Intercept Pop21 Pop22 Trt21 Pop21.Trt21 Pop22.Trt21 BMAc 0.1666667 0.25 0.00 0.1666667 0.25 0.00 BMAe 0.1666667 0.25 0.00 -0.1666667 -0.25 0.00 BVOc 0.1666667 0.00 0.25 0.1666667 0.00 0.25 BVOe 0.1666667 0.00 0.25 -0.1666667 0.00 -0.25 BWFc 0.1666667 -0.25 -0.25 0.1666667 -0.25 -0.25 BWFe 0.1666667 -0.25 -0.25 -0.1666667 0.25 0.25 > > > fit2.cm <- lmFit(as.matrix(t(fakeData[1:24,c("RNA1","RNA2")])),design2.cm) > fit2.cm2 <- eBayescontrasts.fitfit2.cm,cont.matrix2)) > > #Compare results > fit2.stz$coef (Intercept) Pop21 Pop22 Trt21 Pop21:Trt21 Pop22:Trt21 RNA1 7.199447 -0.3117993 0.1362886 0.3226290 0.1894119 0.03240183 RNA2 6.329842 -0.2045172 -0.1395973 -0.2059053 0.3938475 0.15759367 > > fit2.cm2$coef Contrasts Intercept Pop21 Pop22 Trt21 Pop21.Trt21 Pop22.Trt21 RNA1 7.199447 -0.2436550 -0.01961105 0.3226290 0.2056128 0.1271078 RNA2 6.329842 -0.2743158 -0.24185590 -0.2059053 0.4726444 0.3545174 > > #The intercepts and Trt21 main effect the same, but not others > > fit2.stz$p.value (Intercept) Pop21 Pop22 Trt21 Pop21:Trt21 Pop22:Trt21 RNA1 2.907470e-33 0.07375434 0.4245090 0.01094819 0.26936850 0.8486640 RNA2 1.328404e-28 0.34115782 0.5141817 0.17860405 0.07225298 0.4618975 > > fit2.cm2$p.value Contrasts Intercept Pop21 Pop22 Trt21 Pop21.Trt21 Pop22.Trt21 RNA1 2.907470e-33 0.1049556 0.8938907 0.01094819 0.1686224 0.39016022 RNA2 1.328404e-28 0.1445138 0.1965220 0.17860405 0.0149244 0.06225909 > > #same as the coefficients > > #Do overall F-test > topTable(fit2.stz,coef=2:6,sort.by="none") ID Pop21 Pop22 Trt21 Pop21.Trt21 Pop22.Trt21 AveExpr F P.Value adj.P.Val 1 RNA1 -0.3117993 0.1362886 0.3226290 0.1894119 0.03240183 7.199447 2.563622 0.04757618 0.06386501 2 RNA2 -0.2045172 -0.1395973 -0.2059053 0.3938475 0.15759367 6.329842 2.357795 0.06386501 0.06386501 > > topTable(fit2.cm2,coef=2:6,sort.by="none") ID Pop21 Pop22 Trt21 Pop21.Trt21 Pop22.Trt21 AveExpr F P.Value adj.P.Val 1 RNA1 -0.2436550 -0.01961105 0.3226290 0.2056128 0.1271078 7.199447 2.563622 0.04757618 0.06386501 2 RNA2 -0.2743158 -0.24185590 -0.2059053 0.4726444 0.3545174 6.329842 2.357795 0.06386501 0.06386501 > > #despite differences in coefficients, the overall F-stats and p-values are the same > > #Do F-test for main effect of Population > topTable(fit2.stz,coef=2:3,sort.by="none") ID Pop21 Pop22 AveExpr F P.Value adj.P.Val 1 RNA1 -0.3117993 0.1362886 7.199447 1.723965 0.1953264 0.2770150 2 RNA2 -0.2045172 -0.1395973 6.329842 1.339402 0.2770150 0.2770150 > > topTable(fit2.cm2,coef=2:3,sort.by="none") ID Pop21 Pop22 AveExpr F P.Value adj.P.Val 1 RNA1 -0.2436550 -0.01961105 7.199447 1.723965 0.1953264 0.2770150 2 RNA2 -0.2743158 -0.24185590 6.329842 1.339402 0.2770150 0.2770150 > > #Again, F and p-values the same but not coefficients > > #Do F-test for interaction term > > topTable(fit2.stz,coef=5:6,sort.by="none") ID Pop21.Trt21 Pop22.Trt21 AveExpr F P.Value adj.P.Val 1 RNA1 0.1894119 0.03240183 7.199447 1.012854 0.37510055 0.37510055 2 RNA2 0.3938475 0.15759367 6.329842 3.607216 0.03928066 0.07856131 > > topTable(fit2.cm2,coef=5:6,sort.by="none") ID Pop21.Trt21 Pop22.Trt21 AveExpr F P.Value adj.P.Val 1 RNA1 0.2056128 0.1271078 7.199447 1.012854 0.37510055 0.37510055 2 RNA2 0.4726444 0.3545174 6.329842 3.607216 0.03928066 0.07856131 > > #Again, F and p-values the same but not coefficients > > sessionInfo() R version 2.12.0 (2010-10-15) Platform: i386-pc-mingw32/i386 (32-bit) locale: [1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252 LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252 [3] LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252 LC_NUMERIC=C [5] LC_TIME=English_United States.1252 attached base packages: [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base other attached packages: [1] limma_3.6.9 -------------- next part -------------- Sample,Group,Pop,Trt,RNA1,RNA2 1,BMAc,BMA,c,7.023854419,6.153885799 2,BMAc,BMA,c,7.73999053,5.866102667 3,BMAc,BMA,c,7.564131598,6.63833632 4,BMAc,BMA,c,7.27077757,6.594744469 5,BMAe,BMA,e,6.810056104,6.533012004 6,BMAe,BMA,e,6.205452707,5.442167224 7,BMAe,BMA,e,5.676582602,6.026146898 8,BMAe,BMA,e,6.810335264,5.74820562 9,BVOc,BVO,c,6.810056104,5.816310567 10,BVOc,BVO,c,7.516394012,6.75350421 11,BVOc,BVO,c,8.569809392,6.216047464 12,BVOc,BVO,c,7.866805967,5.78187105 13,BVOe,BVO,e,6.61723119,5.788481301 14,BVOe,BVO,e,7.699424633,6.10684267 15,BVOe,BVO,e,7.114597775,7.175774448 16,BVOe,BVO,e,6.4915649,5.883128316 17,BWFc,BWF,c,7.625755429,5.903757463 18,BWFc,BWF,c,7.84666745,5.939844249 19,BWFc,BWF,c,6.629415683,5.928576696 20,BWFc,BWF,c,7.801253152,5.894262583 21,BWFe,BWF,e,7.12819398,5.84216429 22,BWFe,BWF,e,7.217060964,7.053346408 23,BWFe,BWF,e,7.861896997,7.055525414 24,BWFe,BWF,e,6.889417139,9.774177283 25,CARc,CAR,c,8.118040937,5.918385378 26,CARc,CAR,c,6.178935127,5.856860101 27,CARc,CAR,c,7.456442481,6.035642691 28,CARc,CAR,c,7.538999007,5.827788393 29,CARe,CAR,e,6.980979291,6.556491077 30,CARe,CAR,e,7.614278284,5.875536372 31,CARe,CAR,e,5.898541472,7.787748677 32,CARe,CAR,e,5.947753112,6.914974545
• 953 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 616 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6