Call for help about your Chippeakanno R package
0
0
Entering edit mode
Julie Zhu ★ 4.3k
@julie-zhu-3596
Last seen 5 months ago
United States
Dear Wencai, That is a very interesting observation! Yes, the results could be different due to the version difference in annotation dataset. You will need to use the same annotation build as the one you used for mapping your reads. Best regards, Julie On 2/28/11 12:17 AM, "Wencai Ma" <wencai_ma@126.com> wrote: Dear Julie I am now learn to use your ChIPpeakAnno R package. At the beginning of using it, I met a problem that annotation results are different when using your provided AnnotationData and my generated AnnotationData. Now I pasted the code, can you do me a favor to check why they are not the same? #1, your method library(ChIPpeakAnno) data(myPeakList) data(TSS.human.NCBI36) annotatedPeak = annotatePeakInBatch(myPeakList[1:6, ], AnnotationData = TSS.human.NCBI36) as.data.frame(annotatedPeak) #My method library(ChIPpeakAnno) data(myPeakList) mart<-useMart(biomart="ensembl",dataset="hsapiens_gene_ensembl") annotation.data.ensembl.human.TSS=getAnnotation(mart, featureType="TSS") annotatedPeak1 = annotatePeakInBatch(myPeakList[1:6, ], AnnotationData =annotation.data.ensembl.human.TSS) as.data.frame(annotatedPeak1) Why different annotationdata generate different results? which one is correct? Thanks so much. Best regards, Wencai Ma UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 2/27/11 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Annotation Cancer AnnotationData ChIPpeakAnno Annotation Cancer AnnotationData ChIPpeakAnno • 1.0k views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 852 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6