TLR4 in illuminaHumanv3.db
1
0
Entering edit mode
Gavin Koh ▴ 220
@gavin-koh-4582
Last seen 9.6 years ago
Dear Dr Dunning, I am looking at Illumina Human WG6 v3 data in an infection and re-annotated the results using the illuminaHumanv3 package. After re-annotation, TLR4 disappeared. TLR4 seems to be represented by only one probe in that array (ILMN_1706217, sequence GCTGCCACATGTCAGGCCTTATGCTAAGGGTGAGTAATTCCATGGTGCAC). When I BLAT for that sequence, I get only one hit on chromosome 9 that falls squarely into the middle of an exon. I thought I might be using the package incorrectly, but mget("ILMN_1706217",illuminaHumanv3SYMBOL) returns "NA" and mget("ILMN_1731048",illuminaHumanv3SYMBOL) gives me "TLR1", which is correct. Can you help at all, please? I do not know why the probe seems to have been marked bad. Thank you in advance for your time, Gavin Koh Team 15, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute OSX Snow Leopard R 2.12.1 illuminaHumanv3.db 1.8.0 illuminaHumanv3() reports illuminaHumanv3SYMBOL has 25556 mapped keys (of 48803 keys) DB schema: HUMANCHIP_DB DB schema version: 2.1 Organism: Homo sapiens
probe probe • 751 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Mark Dunning ★ 1.1k
@mark-dunning-3319
Last seen 13 months ago
Sheffield, Uk
Hi Gavin, This probe is classified Bad based on the fact that maps to a RepeatMasked element of the genome, specifically a LINE repeat in this case. Previously, we have found repeat mapping probes to be unreliable (Barbosa-Morais et al NAR 2010) and result in spurious signal. It would be advisable to take this information into account when interpreting the data for this probe. The version of the annotation package you are using annotates any Bad or No Match probes as NA. However, now is a good time to mention that the illumina annotation packages that I maintain for Bioconductor 2.8 will have the probe quality and other useful metrics available to the user. Regards, Mark On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Gavin Koh <gavin.koh at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > Dear Dr Dunning, > > I am looking at Illumina Human WG6 v3 data in an infection and > re-annotated the results using the illuminaHumanv3 package. > After re-annotation, TLR4 disappeared. TLR4 seems to be represented by > only one probe in that array (ILMN_1706217, sequence > GCTGCCACATGTCAGGCCTTATGCTAAGGGTGAGTAATTCCATGGTGCAC). When I BLAT for > that sequence, I get only one hit on chromosome 9 that falls squarely > into the middle of an exon. > I thought I might be using the package incorrectly, but > mget("ILMN_1706217",illuminaHumanv3SYMBOL) returns "NA" and > mget("ILMN_1731048",illuminaHumanv3SYMBOL) gives me "TLR1", which is > correct. > > Can you help at all, please? I do not know why the probe seems to have > been marked bad. > > Thank you in advance for your time, > > Gavin Koh > Team 15, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute > > OSX Snow Leopard > R 2.12.1 > illuminaHumanv3.db 1.8.0 > illuminaHumanv3() reports > illuminaHumanv3SYMBOL has 25556 mapped keys (of 48803 keys) > DB schema: HUMANCHIP_DB > DB schema version: 2.1 > Organism: Homo sapiens >
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 585 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6