SNPcounts error in SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815_0.99.3 (i.e., my attempt to update SNPlocs to dbSNP build 134)
1
0
Entering edit mode
Tim Triche ★ 4.2k
@tim-triche-3561
Last seen 20 months ago
United States
Hi Herve (and others), in an attempt to update annotations for some probes, and after taking your workshop at Bioc2011, I have been playing with Biostrings, BSgenomes, GRanges, et al, mostly to good effect (thank you and others for writing and documenting them, they're terrific once the learning curve flattens out). However, I rebuilt the SNPlocs package following instructions you long ago posted for Paul Shannon, and I think I have hit a wall in that respect. I put the offending package (and some others) up: http://flaver.com/annotations/ (in case you need the actual package for an autopsy) When I load and inject SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20101109, your package of build 132, everything goes as planned: I can inject the hard mask with polymorphisms where they're supposed to be, and everything is hunkey dorey. When I do this after building (without apparent incident) the b134 based SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815_0.99.3 , after editing the scripts to look for 'GRCh37.p2' instead of 'GRCh37' and rebuilding, I get the following error: Error in x %in% SNPlocs_seqnames : error in evaluating the argument 'table' in selecting a method for function '%in%': Error in getSNPcount() : internal error: 'SNPcount' data set is broken. Please contact the maintainer of the SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815 package. This seems odd, since the internal regression tests all passed when I built the package. But, obviously I must have missed something somewhere! Any thoughts? Thanks! -- If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because they do not realize how complicated life is. John von Neumann<http: www-groups.dcs.st-="" and.ac.uk="" ~history="" biographies="" von_neumann.html=""> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Regression SNPlocs Biostrings Regression SNPlocs Biostrings • 879 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@vincent-j-carey-jr-4
Last seen 14 days ago
United States
Can you give the sessionInfo() where this occurred? Also I'd recommend triggering the error with options(error=recover) on so the stack can be seen. On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. <tim.triche@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Herve (and others), > > in an attempt to update annotations for some probes, and after taking your > workshop at Bioc2011, I have been playing with Biostrings, BSgenomes, > GRanges, et al, mostly to good effect (thank you and others for writing and > documenting them, they're terrific once the learning curve flattens out). > However, I rebuilt the SNPlocs package following instructions you long ago > posted for Paul Shannon, and I think I have hit a wall in that respect. I > put the offending package (and some others) up: > > http://flaver.com/annotations/ (in case you need the actual package for > an > autopsy) > > When I load and inject SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20101109, your package of > build 132, everything goes as planned: I can inject the hard mask with > polymorphisms where they're supposed to be, and everything is hunkey dorey. > When I do this after building (without apparent incident) the b134 based > SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815_0.99.3 , after editing the scripts to look > for 'GRCh37.p2' instead of 'GRCh37' and rebuilding, I get the following > error: > > Error in x %in% SNPlocs_seqnames : > error in evaluating the argument 'table' in selecting a method for > function '%in%': Error in getSNPcount() : internal error: 'SNPcount' data > set is broken. > Please contact the maintainer of the SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815 > package. > > This seems odd, since the internal regression tests all passed when I built > the package. But, obviously I must have missed something somewhere! > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks! > > > > -- > If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because > they > do not realize how complicated life is. > John von Neumann< > http://www-groups.dcs.st- and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Von_Neumann.html> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Sure, and since you might know the answer... How come the standard policy for SNPlocs package is to use (e.g.) $ch1, but for BSgenomes, it's $chr1? I've been computing overlaps this morning and keep having to change seqlevels() to do it without warnings being raised. thanks, --t On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Vincent Carey <stvjc at="" channing.harvard.edu="">wrote: > Can you give the sessionInfo() where this occurred? Also I'd recommend > triggering the error with > options(error=recover) on so the stack can be seen. > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. <tim.triche at="" gmail.com="">wrote: > >> Hi Herve (and others), >> >> in an attempt to update annotations for some probes, and after taking your >> workshop at Bioc2011, I have been playing with Biostrings, BSgenomes, >> GRanges, et al, mostly to good effect (thank you and others for writing >> and >> documenting them, they're terrific once the learning curve flattens out). >> However, I rebuilt the SNPlocs package following instructions you long >> ago >> posted for Paul Shannon, and I think I have hit a wall in that respect. I >> put the offending package (and some others) up: >> >> http://flaver.com/annotations/ (in case you need the actual package for >> an >> autopsy) >> >> When I load and inject SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20101109, your package of >> build 132, everything goes as planned: I can inject the hard mask with >> polymorphisms where they're supposed to be, and everything is hunkey >> dorey. >> When I do this after building (without apparent incident) the b134 based >> SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815_0.99.3 , after editing the scripts to look >> for 'GRCh37.p2' instead of 'GRCh37' and rebuilding, I get the following >> error: >> >> Error in x %in% SNPlocs_seqnames : >> error in evaluating the argument 'table' in selecting a method for >> function '%in%': Error in getSNPcount() : internal error: 'SNPcount' data >> set is broken. >> Please contact the maintainer of the SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815 >> package. >> >> This seems odd, since the internal regression tests all passed when I >> built >> the package. But, obviously I must have missed something somewhere! >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> >> -- >> If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because >> they >> do not realize how complicated life is. >> John von Neumann< >> http://www-groups.dcs.st- and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Von_Neumann.html> >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioconductor mailing list >> Bioconductor at r-project.org >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >> Search the archives: >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >> > > -- When you emerge in a few years, you can ask someone what you missed, and you'll find it can be summed up in a few minutes. Derek Sivers <http: sivers.org="" berklee=""> -------------- next part -------------- > sessionInfo() R Under development (unstable) (2011-09-10 r56986) Platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (64-bit) locale: [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8 [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8 [7] LC_PAPER=C LC_NAME=C [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C attached base packages: [1] grid stats graphics grDevices datasets utils methods [8] base other attached packages: [1] BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg19_1.3.17 [2] IlluminaHumanMethylation450k.db_1.4.9 [3] plyr_1.6 [4] SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20101109_0.99.2 [5] ChIPpeakAnno_2.0.5 [6] gplots_2.10.1 [7] KernSmooth_2.23-6 [8] caTools_1.12 [9] bitops_1.0-4.1 [10] gdata_2.8.2 [11] limma_3.9.16 [12] org.Hs.eg.db_2.5.0 [13] GO.db_2.5.0 [14] RSQLite_0.9-4 [15] DBI_0.2-5 [16] AnnotationDbi_1.15.15 [17] BSgenome.Ecoli.NCBI.20080805_1.3.17 [18] multtest_2.9.1 [19] Biobase_2.13.9 [20] biomaRt_2.9.2 [21] SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815_0.99.3 [22] BSgenome_1.21.3 [23] Biostrings_2.21.9 [24] GenomicRanges_1.5.35 [25] IRanges_1.11.26 [26] BiocInstaller_1.1.27 [27] gtools_2.6.2 loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] MASS_7.3-14 RCurl_1.6-10 splines_2.14.0 survival_2.36-9 [5] tcltk_2.14.0 tools_2.14.0 XML_3.4-3
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
the ch vs chr is from dbSNP -- whatever they used for the distro the pkg was built from is used in the packages. it is a nuisance but tolerable On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. <ttriche@usc.edu> wrote: > Sure, and since you might know the answer... > > How come the standard policy for SNPlocs package is to use (e.g.) $ch1, but > for BSgenomes, it's $chr1? > > I've been computing overlaps this morning and keep having to change > seqlevels() to do it without warnings being raised. > > thanks, > > --t > > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Vincent Carey < > stvjc@channing.harvard.edu> wrote: > >> Can you give the sessionInfo() where this occurred? Also I'd recommend >> triggering the error with >> options(error=recover) on so the stack can be seen. >> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. <tim.triche@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi Herve (and others), >>> >>> in an attempt to update annotations for some probes, and after taking >>> your >>> workshop at Bioc2011, I have been playing with Biostrings, BSgenomes, >>> GRanges, et al, mostly to good effect (thank you and others for writing >>> and >>> documenting them, they're terrific once the learning curve flattens out). >>> However, I rebuilt the SNPlocs package following instructions you long >>> ago >>> posted for Paul Shannon, and I think I have hit a wall in that respect. >>> I >>> put the offending package (and some others) up: >>> >>> http://flaver.com/annotations/ (in case you need the actual package for >>> an >>> autopsy) >>> >>> When I load and inject SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20101109, your package of >>> build 132, everything goes as planned: I can inject the hard mask with >>> polymorphisms where they're supposed to be, and everything is hunkey >>> dorey. >>> When I do this after building (without apparent incident) the b134 based >>> SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815_0.99.3 , after editing the scripts to >>> look >>> for 'GRCh37.p2' instead of 'GRCh37' and rebuilding, I get the following >>> error: >>> >>> Error in x %in% SNPlocs_seqnames : >>> error in evaluating the argument 'table' in selecting a method for >>> function '%in%': Error in getSNPcount() : internal error: 'SNPcount' data >>> set is broken. >>> Please contact the maintainer of the >>> SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815 >>> package. >>> >>> This seems odd, since the internal regression tests all passed when I >>> built >>> the package. But, obviously I must have missed something somewhere! >>> >>> Any thoughts? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because >>> they >>> do not realize how complicated life is. >>> John von Neumann< >>> http://www-groups.dcs.st- and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Von_Neumann.html >>> > >>> >>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bioconductor mailing list >>> Bioconductor@r-project.org >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >>> Search the archives: >>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >>> >> >> > > > -- > When you emerge in a few years, you can ask someone what you missed, and > you'll find it can be summed up in a few minutes. > > Derek Sivers <http: sivers.org="" berklee=""> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
I think you'd better have just one SNPlocs.* package in your searchlist for the diagnosis to be as simple as possible. But I will stop chattering as HP will surely know the answer. On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. <ttriche@usc.edu> wrote: > Sure, and since you might know the answer... > > How come the standard policy for SNPlocs package is to use (e.g.) $ch1, but > for BSgenomes, it's $chr1? > > I've been computing overlaps this morning and keep having to change > seqlevels() to do it without warnings being raised. > > thanks, > > --t > > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Vincent Carey < > stvjc@channing.harvard.edu> wrote: > >> Can you give the sessionInfo() where this occurred? Also I'd recommend >> triggering the error with >> options(error=recover) on so the stack can be seen. >> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. <tim.triche@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi Herve (and others), >>> >>> in an attempt to update annotations for some probes, and after taking >>> your >>> workshop at Bioc2011, I have been playing with Biostrings, BSgenomes, >>> GRanges, et al, mostly to good effect (thank you and others for writing >>> and >>> documenting them, they're terrific once the learning curve flattens out). >>> However, I rebuilt the SNPlocs package following instructions you long >>> ago >>> posted for Paul Shannon, and I think I have hit a wall in that respect. >>> I >>> put the offending package (and some others) up: >>> >>> http://flaver.com/annotations/ (in case you need the actual package for >>> an >>> autopsy) >>> >>> When I load and inject SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20101109, your package of >>> build 132, everything goes as planned: I can inject the hard mask with >>> polymorphisms where they're supposed to be, and everything is hunkey >>> dorey. >>> When I do this after building (without apparent incident) the b134 based >>> SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815_0.99.3 , after editing the scripts to >>> look >>> for 'GRCh37.p2' instead of 'GRCh37' and rebuilding, I get the following >>> error: >>> >>> Error in x %in% SNPlocs_seqnames : >>> error in evaluating the argument 'table' in selecting a method for >>> function '%in%': Error in getSNPcount() : internal error: 'SNPcount' data >>> set is broken. >>> Please contact the maintainer of the >>> SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815 >>> package. >>> >>> This seems odd, since the internal regression tests all passed when I >>> built >>> the package. But, obviously I must have missed something somewhere! >>> >>> Any thoughts? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because >>> they >>> do not realize how complicated life is. >>> John von Neumann< >>> http://www-groups.dcs.st- and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Von_Neumann.html >>> > >>> >>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bioconductor mailing list >>> Bioconductor@r-project.org >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >>> Search the archives: >>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >>> >> >> > > > -- > When you emerge in a few years, you can ask someone what you missed, and > you'll find it can be summed up in a few minutes. > > Derek Sivers <http: sivers.org="" berklee=""> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
it looks like the problem resolved itself... not precisely the way I was thinking, but with the same effect to me personally. the build 134 package will apparently hit the mirrors presently (Herve was building it unbeknownst to me) and the process of updating & rebuilding a substantial package was educational for me as well. The issue seems to be one of improved/ changed documentation and internal regression testing since the last build, which is a Good Thing from my perspective. thanks all! --t On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Vincent Carey <stvjc@channing.harvard.edu>wrote: > I think you'd better have just one SNPlocs.* package in your searchlist for > the diagnosis to be as simple as possible. But I will stop chattering as > HP will surely know the answer. > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. <ttriche@usc.edu> wrote: > >> Sure, and since you might know the answer... >> >> How come the standard policy for SNPlocs package is to use (e.g.) $ch1, >> but for BSgenomes, it's $chr1? >> >> I've been computing overlaps this morning and keep having to change >> seqlevels() to do it without warnings being raised. >> >> thanks, >> >> --t >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Vincent Carey < >> stvjc@channing.harvard.edu> wrote: >> >>> Can you give the sessionInfo() where this occurred? Also I'd recommend >>> triggering the error with >>> options(error=recover) on so the stack can be seen. >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. <tim.triche@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Herve (and others), >>>> >>>> in an attempt to update annotations for some probes, and after taking >>>> your >>>> workshop at Bioc2011, I have been playing with Biostrings, BSgenomes, >>>> GRanges, et al, mostly to good effect (thank you and others for writing >>>> and >>>> documenting them, they're terrific once the learning curve flattens >>>> out). >>>> However, I rebuilt the SNPlocs package following instructions you long >>>> ago >>>> posted for Paul Shannon, and I think I have hit a wall in that respect. >>>> I >>>> put the offending package (and some others) up: >>>> >>>> http://flaver.com/annotations/ (in case you need the actual package >>>> for an >>>> autopsy) >>>> >>>> When I load and inject SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20101109, your package of >>>> build 132, everything goes as planned: I can inject the hard mask with >>>> polymorphisms where they're supposed to be, and everything is hunkey >>>> dorey. >>>> When I do this after building (without apparent incident) the b134 >>>> based >>>> SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815_0.99.3 , after editing the scripts to >>>> look >>>> for 'GRCh37.p2' instead of 'GRCh37' and rebuilding, I get the following >>>> error: >>>> >>>> Error in x %in% SNPlocs_seqnames : >>>> error in evaluating the argument 'table' in selecting a method for >>>> function '%in%': Error in getSNPcount() : internal error: 'SNPcount' >>>> data >>>> set is broken. >>>> Please contact the maintainer of the >>>> SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815 >>>> package. >>>> >>>> This seems odd, since the internal regression tests all passed when I >>>> built >>>> the package. But, obviously I must have missed something somewhere! >>>> >>>> Any thoughts? >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because >>>> they >>>> do not realize how complicated life is. >>>> John von Neumann< >>>> http://www-groups.dcs.st- and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Von_Neumann.html >>>> > >>>> >>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Bioconductor mailing list >>>> Bioconductor@r-project.org >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >>>> Search the archives: >>>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> When you emerge in a few years, you can ask someone what you missed, and >> you'll find it can be summed up in a few minutes. >> >> Derek Sivers <http: sivers.org="" berklee=""> >> >> > -- When you emerge in a few years, you can ask someone what you missed, and you'll find it can be summed up in a few minutes. Derek Sivers <http: sivers.org="" berklee=""> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
Hi Tim, Hard to know what was going on with your home made SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20101109 (Build 134). Anyway, the one I made on my side is now available for R-2.14 / BioC 2.9 users (source package only for now). I built it with R CMD build --resave-data and this reduced the size of the tarball from 242M to 166M without any significant impact on the time it takes to load the compressed datasets :-) 32 millions SNPs in dbSNP Build 134 vs 23533016 in Build 133: > sum(SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815::getSNPcount()) [1] 32393176 > sum(SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20101109::getSNPcount()) [1] 23533016 Longest run of consecutive SNPs on chr1: 102 (same as with Build 133). See ?injectSNPs for one way to find this run. Let me know if you find problems with it. Yes as Vince said: dbSNP is using ch1, ch2, ... chMT and UCSC chr1, chr2, ... chrM. We use whatever they use. Glad you found about seqlevels(x) <- new_names which is indeed the standard way to rename the sequences of a GRanges/GRangesList /GappedAlignments objects. Cheers, H. On 11-09-15 01:24 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. wrote: > it looks like the problem resolved itself... not precisely the way I was > thinking, but with the same effect to me personally. > > the build 134 package will apparently hit the mirrors presently (Herve > was building it unbeknownst to me) and the process of updating & > rebuilding a substantial package was educational for me as well. The > issue seems to be one of improved/ changed documentation and internal > regression testing since the last build, which is a Good Thing from my > perspective. > > thanks all! > > --t > > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Vincent Carey > <stvjc at="" channing.harvard.edu="" <mailto:stvjc="" at="" channing.harvard.edu="">> wrote: > > I think you'd better have just one SNPlocs.* package in your > searchlist for the diagnosis to be as simple as possible. But I > will stop chattering as HP will surely know the answer. > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. <ttriche at="" usc.edu=""> <mailto:ttriche at="" usc.edu="">> wrote: > > Sure, and since you might know the answer... > > How come the standard policy for SNPlocs package is to use > (e.g.) $ch1, but for BSgenomes, it's $chr1? > > I've been computing overlaps this morning and keep having to > change seqlevels() to do it without warnings being raised. > > thanks, > > --t > > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Vincent Carey > <stvjc at="" channing.harvard.edu="" <mailto:stvjc="" at="" channing.harvard.edu="">> > wrote: > > Can you give the sessionInfo() where this occurred? Also > I'd recommend triggering the error with > options(error=recover) on so the stack can be seen. > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Tim Triche, Jr. > <tim.triche at="" gmail.com="" <mailto:tim.triche="" at="" gmail.com="">> wrote: > > Hi Herve (and others), > > in an attempt to update annotations for some probes, and > after taking your > workshop at Bioc2011, I have been playing with > Biostrings, BSgenomes, > GRanges, et al, mostly to good effect (thank you and > others for writing and > documenting them, they're terrific once the learning > curve flattens out). > However, I rebuilt the SNPlocs package following > instructions you long ago > posted for Paul Shannon, and I think I have hit a wall > in that respect. I > put the offending package (and some others) up: > > http://flaver.com/annotations/ (in case you need the > actual package for an > autopsy) > > When I load and inject SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20101109, > your package of > build 132, everything goes as planned: I can inject the > hard mask with > polymorphisms where they're supposed to be, and > everything is hunkey dorey. > When I do this after building (without apparent > incident) the b134 based > SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815_0.99.3 , after editing > the scripts to look > for 'GRCh37.p2' instead of 'GRCh37' and rebuilding, I > get the following > error: > > Error in x %in% SNPlocs_seqnames : > error in evaluating the argument 'table' in selecting > a method for > function '%in%': Error in getSNPcount() : internal > error: 'SNPcount' data > set is broken. > Please contact the maintainer of the > SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP.20110815 > package. > > This seems odd, since the internal regression tests all > passed when I built > the package. But, obviously I must have missed > something somewhere! > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks! > > > > -- > If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it > is only because they > do not realize how complicated life is. > John von > Neumann<http: www-groups.dcs.st-="" and.ac.uk="" ~history="" biographies="" von_neumann.html=""> <http: www-groups.dcs.st-="" and.ac.uk="" %7ehistory="" biographies="" von_neumann.html="">> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at r-project.org > <mailto:bioconductor at="" r-project.org=""> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > > > > > > -- > When you emerge in a few years, you can ask someone what you > missed, and you'll find it can be summed up in a few minutes. > > Derek Sivers <http: sivers.org="" berklee=""> > > > > > > -- > When you emerge in a few years, you can ask someone what you missed, and > you'll find it can be summed up in a few minutes. > > Derek Sivers <http: sivers.org="" berklee=""> > -- Hervé Pagès Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109-1024 E-mail: hpages at fhcrc.org Phone: (206) 667-5791 Fax: (206) 667-1319
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 259 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6