goSeq error
1
0
Entering edit mode
@matthew-young-4865
Last seen 9.6 years ago
Hi Steve, This is not an error I've encountered before, so I don't know what the problem is off the top of my head. The error message makes me guess that the PWF is returning weird values (outside of the (0,1) range) for a couple of genes. Could you either send me the variables you used as input or try looking at the PWF p-values for the down list and see how they're distributed. If there's just a couple of values that are causing the problem, try changing them to NA, goseq will then treat them as "unknown length" and assign them a median weighting. If there are many with a nonsensical value I'll have to look at it more closely. Cheers, Matt On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:26 PM, steve Shen <shen.sq@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Many thanks. It may be version unrelated. However, it handled the first > list perfectly. I can easily get terms with first list. However, the 2nd > and third lists are coming with errors. I assume there is limitation for > handling multiple .goWalls. You are right. I will wait the new R2.14 > release and to see what the diagnostics from Godon's group is. > > Best, > Steve > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Steve Lianoglou < > mailinglist.honeypot@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 6:10 PM, steve Shen <shen.sq@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Using goSeq to analyze two gene lists - up regulated and down regulated > > > genes generated with edgeR, the up regulated list seems good, but there > > is > > > an error with down regulated list. Couldn't figure out what's wrong > with > > > it. Please refer to the command line and output below. Thanks very for > me > > > for help. > > > > Not sure what's wrong with it either, but your sessionInfo shows that > > you are using a (1) old version of R (2.12.1), and therefore (2) an > > old version of goseq. > > > > I would suggest upgrading to the newest R/Bioconductor/goseq combo to > > see if the error is still there. > > > > The slightly unfortunate thing for you is that R 2.14.0 is also > > scheduled to come out tomorrow so if you choose to upgrade to R > > 2.13.x, you will have the latest and greatest for < 24 hrs. The > > upgrade process isn't all that burdensome, so no big deal, but you > > might consider updating straight to the version of 2.14 that you can > > get from the link below as 2.14-branch: > > > > http://r.research.att.com/ > > > > > Steve > > > > You said it, brother. > > > > -- > > Steve Lianoglou > > Graduate Student: Computational Systems Biology > > | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center > > | Weill Medical College of Cornell University > > Contact Info: http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos/contact > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Cancer PROcess edgeR goseq ASSIGN Cancer PROcess edgeR goseq ASSIGN • 1.0k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@matthew-young-4865
Last seen 9.6 years ago
Sorry, I meant PWF probabilities, not p-values. On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Matthew Young <myworkemailisnow@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Steve, > > This is not an error I've encountered before, so I don't know what the > problem is off the top of my head. The error message makes me guess that > the PWF is returning weird values (outside of the (0,1) range) for a couple > of genes. Could you either send me the variables you used as input or try > looking at the PWF p-values for the down list and see how they're > distributed. If there's just a couple of values that are causing the > problem, try changing them to NA, goseq will then treat them as "unknown > length" and assign them a median weighting. If there are many with > a nonsensical value I'll have to look at it more closely. > > Cheers, > > Matt > > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:26 PM, steve Shen <shen.sq@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Steve, >> >> Many thanks. It may be version unrelated. However, it handled the first >> list perfectly. I can easily get terms with first list. However, the 2nd >> and third lists are coming with errors. I assume there is limitation for >> handling multiple .goWalls. You are right. I will wait the new R2.14 >> release and to see what the diagnostics from Godon's group is. >> >> Best, >> Steve >> >> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Steve Lianoglou < >> mailinglist.honeypot@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 6:10 PM, steve Shen <shen.sq@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > Hi All, >> > > >> > > Using goSeq to analyze two gene lists - up regulated and down >> regulated >> > > genes generated with edgeR, the up regulated list seems good, but >> there >> > is >> > > an error with down regulated list. Couldn't figure out what's wrong >> with >> > > it. Please refer to the command line and output below. Thanks very >> for me >> > > for help. >> > >> > Not sure what's wrong with it either, but your sessionInfo shows that >> > you are using a (1) old version of R (2.12.1), and therefore (2) an >> > old version of goseq. >> > >> > I would suggest upgrading to the newest R/Bioconductor/goseq combo to >> > see if the error is still there. >> > >> > The slightly unfortunate thing for you is that R 2.14.0 is also >> > scheduled to come out tomorrow so if you choose to upgrade to R >> > 2.13.x, you will have the latest and greatest for < 24 hrs. The >> > upgrade process isn't all that burdensome, so no big deal, but you >> > might consider updating straight to the version of 2.14 that you can >> > get from the link below as 2.14-branch: >> > >> > http://r.research.att.com/ >> > >> > > Steve >> > >> > You said it, brother. >> > >> > -- >> > Steve Lianoglou >> > Graduate Student: Computational Systems Biology >> > | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center >> > | Weill Medical College of Cornell University >> > Contact Info: http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos/contact >> > >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioconductor mailing list >> Bioconductor@r-project.org >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >> Search the archives: >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 784 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6