edgeR asimmetry in miRNA experiment
0
0
Entering edit mode
@gordon-smyth
Last seen 12 hours ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia
No, the unbalanced sample numbers will not cause edgeR to give asymmetric DE results. Quite the opposite. Since, miRNA results are expected to be globally assymmetric, I would expect edgeR to be under-stating rather than exaggerating the assymetry. BTW, please upgrade to the current release of R, Bioconductor and edgeR. Best wishes Gordon On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Genomnia - Guffanti Alessandro wrote: > Dear colleagues: I am analyzing the result of some cancer samples miRNA NGS > experiments with edgeR, with the following setup: > > R version 2.15.3 (2013-03-01) > Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit) > > locale: > [1] LC_COLLATE=Italian_Italy.1252 LC_CTYPE=Italian_Italy.1252 > [3] LC_MONETARY=Italian_Italy.1252 LC_NUMERIC=C > [5] LC_TIME=Italian_Italy.1252 > > attached base packages: > [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base > > other attached packages: > [1] edgeR_3.0.8 limma_3.14.4 > > I am following a rather standard workflow - please note that we have 8 > samples and only 1 control > >> targets <- read.delim("targets.txt", stringsAsFactors = FALSE) >> d <- readDGE(targets, header=FALSE) >> colnames(d) <- > c("ARMS1","ARMS2","ARMS3","ARMS4","ERMS1","ERMS2","ERMS3","ERMS4","N MS") >> dim(d) > [1] 2038 9 >> keep <- rowSums(cpm(d)> 5) >= 3 >> dim(d) > [1] 685 9 >> d$samples$lib.size <- colSums(d$counts) >> d<-calcNormFactors(d) >> d <- estimateCommonDisp(d, verbose=TRUE) > Disp = 0.71417 , BCV = 0.8451 >> d <- estimateTagwiseDisp(d, trend="none",verbose=TRUE) > Using interpolation to estimate tagwise dispersion. >> de.com <- exactTest(d) >> sumde.com$table$PValue < 0.05) > [1] 97 >> topValues <- topTagsde.com,n=97) >> summary(decideTestsDGEde.com,p.value=0.05)) > [,1] > -1 44 > 0 641 > 1 0 > > What we noticed is that there is a strong asimmetry in the corrected P > values, in that only the downregulated miRNAs have a significant corrected P > value - the upregulated miRNAs are less when examing the uncorreetd counts, > basically we have alf of the CPM > > Questions: > > => is the unbalanced experimental design affecting the results ? this > unbalance is coherent with the literature, in cancers the majority of miRNAs > are downregulated > > => if yes, can I correct it or we should just take the results as they are > and validate extensively if we want to explore also the upregulated miRNAs ? > > Thanks a lot in advance for any help, > > Alessandro & colleagues > ----------------------------------------------------- > Alessandro Guffanti - Head, Bioinformatics > Genomnia srl > Via Nerviano, 31/B ??? 20020 Lainate (MI) > Tel. +39-0293305.702 / Fax +39-0293305.777 > www.genomnia.com [http://www.genomnia.com/] > alessandro.guffanti at genomnia.com [mailto:alessandro.guffanti at genomnia.com] ______________________________________________________________________ The information in this email is confidential and intend...{{dropped:5}}
miRNA Cancer edgeR miRNA Cancer edgeR • 787 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 642 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6