Question: ComBat error message, thanks
0
gravatar for Guan
5.3 years ago by
Guan20
Guan20 wrote:
Hi All, I understood from the preivous post "[BioC] ComBat_ Error in solve.default(t(design) %*% design): Lapack routine dgesv: system is exactly singular: U[4, 4] = 0" that this error is to do with the confounded batch and covariate status. I have the same ComBat_Error appeared when running surrogate variable analysis (SVA) and have several other related questions. Hope you could have a look. Many thanks for any opinions/suggestions. Data set: 24 samples from 6 subjects (4 time points/subject: 2 baseline samples collected on different days, 1 during drug treatment, 1 after drug treatment). Experiments were done with Affymetrix GeneChip 3.0 for miRNA expression profiling. Initial data analysis: "oligo" is used to handle Affy CEL files, "rma()" is used for data normalization. After this, I still see PC1 seems to correlate with certain batch effect (which I'm not aware, i.e. not come from different scan dates) on the PCA plot. Then "sva" package is used to estimate the surrogate variables, followed by "ComBat()". Now, come to the ComBat_Error, when I specified the contrasts as (Base2-Base1, During-Base1, Post-Base1). The pheno input attached below: sample batch Status GW2miRNA1_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 1 1 Base1 GW2miRNA2_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 1 1 Post7 GW2miRNA3_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 2 1 Base1 GW2miRNA4_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 2 1 Post7 GW2miRNA5_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 3 1 Base1 GW2miRNA6_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 3 1 Post7 GW2miRNA7_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 4 1 Base1 GW2miRNA8_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 4 1 Post7 GW2miRNA9_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 5 1 Base1 GW2miRNA10_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 5 1 Post7 GW2miRNA11_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 6 1 Base1 GW2miRNA12_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 6 1 Post7 GW1miRNA13_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 6 2 Base2 GW1miRNA14_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 6 2 During4 GW1miRNA15_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 4 2 Base2 GW1miRNA16_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 1 2 During4 GW1miRNA17_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 5 2 Base2 GW1miRNA18_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 5 2 During4 GW1miRNA19_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 4 2 During4 GW1miRNA20_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 3 2 Base2 GW1miRNA21_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 3 2 During4 GW1miRNA22_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 1 2 Base2 GW1miRNA23_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 2 3 During4 GW1miRNA24_(miRNA-3_0).CEL 2 3 Base2 I understand that the batch is confounded with the status as you could see in the phenotype file above. Since the two baseline samples are from same subjects, however, collected on different days before injecting the drug. I'm thinking whether it makes sense to classify "Base1 + Base2" as "Base", and make contrasts for "During - Base" and "Post - Base". Other columns in above pheno file will be kept the same and re-run the "sva"? Or is it more appropriate to do two separate "sva" analyses, i.e. "Post7 - Base1" for first 12 samples as hybridized and scanned at the same time and "During4 - Base2" for the last 12 samples as they were treated as a batch (however, scanned at two times, that's why they were labelled as batch 2 and 3 in column of "batch"). Hope I've described clearly. Much appreciated for suggestions/opinions. Regards Guan
mirna normalization affy • 483 views
ADD COMMENTlink written 5.3 years ago by Guan20
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 16.09
Traffic: 260 users visited in the last hour