edgeR: Analyze mini-time-series MeDIP data of pooled DNAs without replicates?
1
0
Entering edit mode
Vang Le ▴ 70
@vang-le-6690
Last seen 19 months ago
Denmark
Hello edgeR users, I have been checking around to find out how to best analyze our data as well as remedy our experiment design. It's hard to decide so I will try my best to explain what we have, what we want in a rather long message. Please bear with me. FIRSTLY SOME WORDS ABOUT OUR SAMPLES: We did experiments with two groups of test animals namely treated "T" and control "C" (without treatment) groups. Bot T and C have 20 subjects each. We took samples 4 times with 2-week intervals. For example, at week 2, we extracted DNA samples from 5 subjects in the C group and 5 subjects in T group. At week 4, we extracted DNA for each group from each 5 other subjects. And so on. However, before MeDIP-seq we pooled all 5 DNA samples of the same group and same week together to save time and money. This is like making direct biological everage. So the sequencing samples look like this: > targets Week Control Treated 1 week2 C2 T2 2 week4 C4 T4 3 week6 C6 T6 4 week8 C8 T8 Where: C2 is the DNA pool of 5 control subjects at Week2; T2 is the DNA pool of 5 treated subjects at Week 2 and so on. We then subject the pools through MeDIP-Seq protocols and sequence them on NGS platform (color-space). OUR RESEARCH QUESTIONS: 1. Which genes are hypo/hyper-methylated in response to our treatment? 2. How does methylation rate/status change from one time point to another (i.e. which one responded early, which one responded later)? CONSIDERATIONS SO FAR: I have looked through R's package, MEDIPS. But it is not intended for our case because it does not have functions to handle time-series data. It also relies very much on edgeR to do its job. So I think it would be more flexible to use edgeR directly myself. Reading edgeRUsersGuide.pdf, I found that our case is similar to the example in Section "3.3 Treatment effects over all times". However, we don't have replicates the way edgeR expects. CONSIDERING WE HAVE TIME-SERIES AND DATA AT EACH TIME POINT IS POOLED DATA, MY QUESTIONS ARE: 1. Can we find the answers for our research questions based on the current data by using edgeR? And how, in high-level view? 2. I am thinking since we have the pools (biological mean) we can somehow skip some statistics treatment (i.e. relax p.value, set dispersion value to something reasonable) and get on with the workflow on Section 3.3. Will this be alright in terms of data analysis practice and edgeR expectations? 3. If we must do something from sequencing step, what would be the most economical and time-saveing things to do? 4. Would you suggest anything else to make the best out of this case? Thank you for your time. Kind regards, Vang Quy Le Bioinformatician, Molecular Biologist, PhD +45 97 66 56 29 vql at rn.dk AALBORG UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL Section for Molecular Diagnostics, Clinical Biochemistry Reberbansgade DK 9000 Aalborg www.aalborguh.rn.dk
Sequencing edgeR MEDIPS Sequencing edgeR MEDIPS • 1.3k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@gordon-smyth
Last seen 5 hours ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia

Dear Vang Quy Le,

I don't have any experience analysing MeDIP data myself, so I will assume that you know how to generate counts from MeDIP that are suitable for edgeR, and I will just answer the linear modelling question.

I also assume that you have read the section of the edgeR User's Guide called "What to do if you have no replicates."

In terms of an edgeR analysis, you have two main choices. First, you could simply omit the dispersion estimation steps of the edgeR pipeline and run glmFit() and glmLRT() with a manually set value for the dispersion. You have already mentioned this possibility. There is no problems with this except that the number of DE genes will be highly dependent on the dispersion value you choice. Nevertheless, it is much better than assuming Poisson variability. We took this approach for our paper in Cell Reports:

  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23375371

Second, you could manufacture residual degrees of freedom by fitting a smooth curve to the time course trends. This approach is explained the section called "Many time points" in the limma User's Guide. We took this approach to analyse the development stages of Drosophila melanogaster in the voom paper:

  http://genomebiology.com/2014/15/2/R29

Personally, I would take the second approach. I would fit an orthogonal quadratic polynomial to the time trend for the Control and Treated groups separately. This will allow you to use the complete edgeR pipeline including dispersion estimation. This will allow you to test for time trends for each gene in each of the groups. It will also allow you examine at which time point each gene has its peak expression. See the analysis in the voom paper.

Best wishes
Gordon

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 210 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6