Could limma be as good as GeneSpring in nomalization?
2
0
Entering edit mode
xpzhang ▴ 90
@xpzhang-780
Last seen 9.6 years ago
Hi, Today I read a paper in Plant Cell, and the researcheres used GeneSpring 4.2 software (Silicon Genetics, Redwood, CA) to nomalize their data. I wonder if anyone here knows something about the software, and if this software has more function than limma. Thank you very much! -- Xiaopeng ZHANG<xpzhang@genetics.ac.cn>
Genetics limma Genetics limma • 946 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@michael-watson-iah-c-378
Last seen 9.6 years ago
:-) GeneSpring is a good piece of software for those who can afford it, and is excellent for the production and visualisation of heatmaps and dendrograms. However, I can guarentee you that the Bioconductor microarray packages (and there are many!) have WAY more functionality than any commercial package :-) -----Original Message----- From: bioconductor-bounces@stat.math.ethz.ch on behalf of xpzhang Sent: Thu 11/25/2004 8:44 AM To: bioconductor Cc: Subject: [BioC] Could limma be as good as GeneSpring in nomalization? Hi, Today I read a paper in Plant Cell, and the researcheres used GeneSpring 4.2 software (Silicon Genetics, Redwood, CA) to nomalize their data. I wonder if anyone here knows something about the software, and if this software has more function than limma. Thank you very much! -- Xiaopeng ZHANG<xpzhang@genetics.ac.cn> _______________________________________________ Bioconductor mailing list Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@adaikalavan-ramasamy-675
Last seen 9.6 years ago
Someone once demonstrated the normalisation procedures in GeneSpring. I think they had MAS 4.0, MAS 5.0 and RMA at the time. However what was interesting is that all of this were (visibly) calling R scripts to BioConductor packages to perform the normalisation. If the trend continues, then I believe their normalisation procedures will be a subset of those available in R/BioConductor. My perception is that people mainly use GeneSpring for graphical purposes and normalisation is seen as "do once and forget about it". Others can correct me if I am wrong in my opinion of GeneSpring and normalisation. Regards, Adai On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 08:44, xpzhang wrote: > Hi, > > Today I read a paper in Plant Cell, and the researcheres used GeneSpring > 4.2 software (Silicon Genetics, Redwood, CA) to nomalize their data. I > wonder if anyone here knows something about the software, and if this > software has more function than limma. > > Thank you very much!
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 684 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6