Search
Question: Recent problem with biomaRt query
0
gravatar for nickp60
3.3 years ago by
nickp600
United States
nickp600 wrote:

Has anyone run into issues recently with sumitting biomaRt queries?  I am submitting a list of bacterial gene accessions to uniprot dataset and returning GO ID's.  Last month, with the same list of ~384 genes, I was returning a list of about 500 GO Terms.  Now, I get around 250 GO Terms. Was there an update that I missed, or can anyone suggest an alternate explanation?

 

 

>sessionInfo()

R version 3.2.0 (2015-04-16)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0 (64-bit)
Running under: OS X 10.10.2 (Yosemite)

locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8

attached base packages:
 [1] grid      parallel  stats4    stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets 
 [9] methods   base     

other attached packages:
 [1] RCurl_1.95-4.6            bitops_1.0-6              gridExtra_0.9.1          
 [4] fpc_2.1-9                 e1071_1.6-4               plyr_1.8.2               
 [7] biomaRt_2.24.0            reshape2_1.4.1            shiny_0.12.0             
[10] DESeq2_1.8.1              RcppArmadillo_0.5.100.1.0 Rcpp_0.11.6              
[13] GenomicRanges_1.20.3      GenomeInfoDb_1.4.0        IRanges_2.2.1            
[16] S4Vectors_0.6.0           BiocGenerics_0.14.0       ggplot2_1.0.1            
[19] XLConnect_0.2-11          XLConnectJars_0.2-9       dplyr_0.4.1              

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
 [1] Biobase_2.28.0       jsonlite_0.9.16      splines_3.2.0       
 [4] Formula_1.2-1        assertthat_0.1       latticeExtra_0.6-26 
 [7] robustbase_0.92-3    RSQLite_1.0.0        lattice_0.20-31     
[10] digest_0.6.8         RColorBrewer_1.1-2   XVector_0.8.0       
[13] colorspace_1.2-6     htmltools_0.2.6      httpuv_1.3.2        
[16] XML_3.98-1.1         genefilter_1.50.0    xtable_1.7-4        
[19] mvtnorm_1.0-2        scales_0.2.4         BiocParallel_1.2.1  
[22] annotate_1.46.0      nnet_7.3-9           lazyeval_0.1.10     
[25] proto_0.3-10         survival_2.38-1      magrittr_1.5        
[28] mime_0.3             mclust_5.0.1         MASS_7.3-40         
[31] foreign_0.8-63       class_7.3-12         tools_3.2.0         
[34] trimcluster_0.1-2    stringr_1.0.0        kernlab_0.9-20      
[37] munsell_0.4.2        locfit_1.5-9.1       cluster_2.0.1       
[40] AnnotationDbi_1.30.1 lambda.r_1.1.7       futile.logger_1.4.1 
[43] labeling_0.3         gtable_0.1.2         flexmix_2.3-13      
[46] DBI_0.3.1            R6_2.0.1             prabclus_2.2-6      
[49] Hmisc_3.16-0         futile.options_1.0.0 modeltools_0.2-21   
[52] rJava_0.9-6          stringi_0.4-1        geneplotter_1.46.0  
[55] rpart_4.1-9          acepack_1.3-3.3      DEoptimR_1.0-2      
[58] diptest_0.75-6      

ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.3 years ago • written 3.3 years ago by nickp600
0
gravatar for nickp60
3.3 years ago by
nickp600
United States
nickp600 wrote:

A little more digging reveals that the database I have been using had been part of a proteome culling effort to reduce redundency.  See the link below for more info. 

http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/A8YZ21

ADD COMMENTlink written 3.3 years ago by nickp600
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.2.0
Traffic: 371 users visited in the last hour