Recent problem with biomaRt query
1
0
Entering edit mode
nickp60 • 0
@nickp60-8205
Last seen 6.2 years ago
United States

Has anyone run into issues recently with sumitting biomaRt queries?  I am submitting a list of bacterial gene accessions to uniprot dataset and returning GO ID's.  Last month, with the same list of ~384 genes, I was returning a list of about 500 GO Terms.  Now, I get around 250 GO Terms. Was there an update that I missed, or can anyone suggest an alternate explanation?

 

 

>sessionInfo()

R version 3.2.0 (2015-04-16)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0 (64-bit)
Running under: OS X 10.10.2 (Yosemite)

locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8

attached base packages:
 [1] grid      parallel  stats4    stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets 
 [9] methods   base     

other attached packages:
 [1] RCurl_1.95-4.6            bitops_1.0-6              gridExtra_0.9.1          
 [4] fpc_2.1-9                 e1071_1.6-4               plyr_1.8.2               
 [7] biomaRt_2.24.0            reshape2_1.4.1            shiny_0.12.0             
[10] DESeq2_1.8.1              RcppArmadillo_0.5.100.1.0 Rcpp_0.11.6              
[13] GenomicRanges_1.20.3      GenomeInfoDb_1.4.0        IRanges_2.2.1            
[16] S4Vectors_0.6.0           BiocGenerics_0.14.0       ggplot2_1.0.1            
[19] XLConnect_0.2-11          XLConnectJars_0.2-9       dplyr_0.4.1              

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
 [1] Biobase_2.28.0       jsonlite_0.9.16      splines_3.2.0       
 [4] Formula_1.2-1        assertthat_0.1       latticeExtra_0.6-26 
 [7] robustbase_0.92-3    RSQLite_1.0.0        lattice_0.20-31     
[10] digest_0.6.8         RColorBrewer_1.1-2   XVector_0.8.0       
[13] colorspace_1.2-6     htmltools_0.2.6      httpuv_1.3.2        
[16] XML_3.98-1.1         genefilter_1.50.0    xtable_1.7-4        
[19] mvtnorm_1.0-2        scales_0.2.4         BiocParallel_1.2.1  
[22] annotate_1.46.0      nnet_7.3-9           lazyeval_0.1.10     
[25] proto_0.3-10         survival_2.38-1      magrittr_1.5        
[28] mime_0.3             mclust_5.0.1         MASS_7.3-40         
[31] foreign_0.8-63       class_7.3-12         tools_3.2.0         
[34] trimcluster_0.1-2    stringr_1.0.0        kernlab_0.9-20      
[37] munsell_0.4.2        locfit_1.5-9.1       cluster_2.0.1       
[40] AnnotationDbi_1.30.1 lambda.r_1.1.7       futile.logger_1.4.1 
[43] labeling_0.3         gtable_0.1.2         flexmix_2.3-13      
[46] DBI_0.3.1            R6_2.0.1             prabclus_2.2-6      
[49] Hmisc_3.16-0         futile.options_1.0.0 modeltools_0.2-21   
[52] rJava_0.9-6          stringi_0.4-1        geneplotter_1.46.0  
[55] rpart_4.1-9          acepack_1.3-3.3      DEoptimR_1.0-2      
[58] diptest_0.75-6      

biomart biomaRt R rstudio • 701 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
nickp60 • 0
@nickp60-8205
Last seen 6.2 years ago
United States

A little more digging reveals that the database I have been using had been part of a proteome culling effort to reduce redundency.  See the link below for more info. 

http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/A8YZ21

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 244 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6