edgeR for with no Replicate
1
0
Entering edit mode
@sushant-pawar-9287
Last seen 7.2 years ago
Nashik

Hi all,

(edgeR Page no. 21,22 User Guide)

I am running program of edgeR for without replicate . I am getting one one error so please help me in that .

====================================

> bcv=0.2
> library(edgeR)
> counts=matrix(rnbinom(40,size=1/bcv^2,mu=10),20,2)
> y=DGEList(counts=counts,group=1:2)
> et=exactTest(y,dispersion = bcv^2)
> et
An object of class "DGEExact"
$table
       logFC   logCPM    PValue
1 -0.4284000 15.82489 0.6982242
2 -0.2791370 16.10715 0.8677253
3  0.2291273 15.68416 1.0000000
4  0.8075674 15.98288 0.3752598
5 -0.2777101 15.62054 0.8292796
15 more rows ...

$comparison
[1] "1" "2"

$genes
NULL

> y1=y
> y1$samples$group=1
> y0=estimateCommonDisp(y1[housekeeping,])
Error in y1[housekeeping, ] : 
  error in evaluating the argument 'i' in selecting a method for function '[': Error: object 'housekeeping' not found

========================

edger without replicate • 2.7k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
Yunshun Chen ▴ 840
@yunshun-chen-5451
Last seen 26 days ago
Australia

The error message reads: object 'housekeeping' not found. Clearly you haven't defined housekeeping.

In the edgeR user's guide, it reads "For example, suppose that housekeeping is an index variable..." You can not simply copying the code from the user's guide and expect it to run without defining the object.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

is it should be the vector or single gene name . give some example

 

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

is it should be the vector or single gene name ? . give some example

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

It should be an index variable (a vector of row indices).

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

but what type of Genes we should store in that variable ?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Actually  i am new to this field ,

I have add this to gene. again i am getting some warning . so please help me .

=============================

housekeeping=c("REG3A","GP2")

> housekeeping=c("REG3A","GP2")
> y0=estimateCommonDisp(y1[housekeeping,])
> y$common.dispersion=y0$common.dispersion
> et=exactTest(y)
There were 50 or more warnings (use warnings() to see the first 50)
  full precision may not have been achieved in 'qbeta'
44: In qbeta(0.5, alpha1[!all.zero], alpha2[!all.zero]) :
  full precision may not have been achieved in 'qbeta'
45: In qbeta(0.5, alpha1[!all.zero], alpha2[!all.zero]) :
  full precision may not have been achieved in 'qbeta'
46: In qbeta(0.5, alpha1[!all.zero], alpha2[!all.zero]) :
  full precision may not have been achieved in 'qbeta'
47: In qbeta(0.5, alpha1[!all.zero], alpha2[!all.zero]) :
  full precision may not have been achieved in 'qbeta'
48: In qbeta(0.5, alpha1[!all.zero], alpha2[!all.zero]) :
  full precision may not have been achieved in 'qbeta'
49: In qbeta(0.5, alpha1[!all.zero], alpha2[!all.zero]) :
  full precision may not have been achieved in 'qbeta'
50: In qbeta(0.5, alpha1[!all.zero], alpha2[!all.zero]) :
  full precision may not have been achieved in 'qbeta'
ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

Estimating the dispersion from two housekeeping genes is not reliable. You need a decently sized set of about 50 - 100 genes that are expected to be constant across most biological conditions. Things that come to mind are actin, core metabolic proteins, etc. REG3A and GP2 would not be obvious choices.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 706 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6