Pathway analysis of differentially methylated CpGs
0
0
Entering edit mode
philipp24 ▴ 30
@philipp24-8672
Last seen 7.6 years ago
Germany

Dear all,

I have 450k methylation data from 120 samples. I perform differential methylation analysis (using the m-values) for a interval scaled variable (current_phenotype with levels of 1,2,3) with limma which identifies 1336 hypo- and 635 hypermethylated CpG´s.The significant CpG´s (FDR<0.05 & logFC > 2) are then used for an analysis of differentially methylated pathways using the missMethyl package (gometh function). Although I get several differential methylated pathways I have troubles with interpreting the results. Specifically, how do I know whether higher values of "current_phenotpye" are associated with increased or decreased pathway methylation? Moreover, does it make sense to subject both significant hyper- and hypermethylated CpGs to the pathway analysis (since the gometh function does only know which CpG is significant, however not the direction i.e. whether it is hypo- or hypermethylated)?

Thanks for your help,

Philipp 

library(limma)
library(missMethyl)

design2 = model.matrix(~current_phenotype)
fit2 = lmFit(m_values, design2)  
keep <- fit2$Amean > median(fit2$Amean)
fitEb <- eBayes(fit2[keep,], robust=T, trend=T)
summary(decideTests(fitEb))

   (Intercept) current_phenotype
-1         812              1336
0        20713            204111
1       184557               635

tt <- topTable(fitEb,coef=2,sort.by="p", p.value=0.05, lfc=2, adjust.method="BH",number=Inf)
     
gst.KEGG <- gometh(sig.cpg=rownames(tt), all.cpg=rownames(m_values), collection="KEGG", prior.prob = T)
gst.KEGG <- gst.KEGG[order(gst.KEGG$FDR),]
gst.KEGG  <- gst.KEGG[gst.KEGG$FDR<0.05,]
head(gst.KEGG)
limma missmethyl • 1.2k views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 946 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6