WGCNA - Signed vs signed hybrid networks
1
1
Entering edit mode
@bramverstockt-11079
Last seen 4.8 years ago
KUL, Belgium

Dear all

As I just started using WGCNA, it's not entirely clear for me what's the difference between "signed" and "signed hybrid" networks. Can anyone clarify, please? 

Many thanks in advance!

 

 

wgcna • 3.1k views
ADD COMMENT
6
Entering edit mode
@peter-langfelder-4469
Last seen 3 months ago
United States

In practical terms, the difference is negligible.

In a signed network, the similarity is defined as (1+cor)/2; in a signed hybrid the similarity equals the correlation if the correlation is positive and zero otherwise (it is called hybrid because it is a hybrid of weighted and unweighted networks). The similarity is raised to a power which is usually twice as big in signed networks than it is in hybrid networks. For correlations near 1, ( (1+cor)/2 )^(2*beta) approximately equals cor^beta, and for low correlations both adjacencies are near zero.

Peter

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Dear Dr. Langfelder

Many thanks for your quick response! As the difference between signed and signed hybrid is neglibigle, is there a difference in their applications? For instance, do you recommend one of both when analyzing data in relation to a binary trait? Many thanks for your answer.

ADD REPLY
3
Entering edit mode

I usually use signed hybrid since I like to have adjacencies for negative correlations exactly zero and I find the formula cor^beta "cleaner", but as I said, these are more "cosmetic" rather than fundamental reasons.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 331 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6