Recently (might be a at least for the past several weeks), replies to an emailed support question bounces.  That didn't use to be the case.  This is irritating, I have no idea when it happened.

I'm using gmail, and I have just checked that the email at the support site is the correct one.

````
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

     reply+03243bc9+code@bioconductor.org

Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain bioconductor.org by delivery.bioconductor.org. [54.87.114.204].

The error that the other server returned was:
550 5.1.1 <reply+03243bc9+code@bioconductor.org>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table


----- Original message -----

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=BC40mLFkoP0cDmHFeSNkMPalRg6c5t0goRuKn2PQORQ=;
        b=GFN4zLfRyqkU9fHlVpgkF1hm96gjOZfJOShQ85Ks2PKa1jeOOpfVz65VOUaZeiltMa
         b6goORFb2FpdmW/Is/07RTYUnoapGJ0p4RwA5pvxXOX/79uzreEKhFuIHElC3IE8s8vD
         qDpsoi+oBWBrFZBH0OQWUcBmaYr8jJdiqsd5c/fF4OOrSjvfqLo35/EHOsNikUItfB1t
         JSHQlBJVCWH4PoGFSXwHpUrmHzvvW3WBd72+yBuuIA57CHUHcl4VDUSuOyPGDtZbELYJ
         QrJezs+mK4GDdal8qA65cDzQLIGkuCZEgyXkDW0mmILFHGFN+Ky9KLw0+j5MEVDY/ufw
         +M5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=BC40mLFkoP0cDmHFeSNkMPalRg6c5t0goRuKn2PQORQ=;
        b=aLHfdalmFCCK2Mxj9BvCapgV6xZpb1sFuQHlRwFM2Us90S1LG8Mp8zf9VPB44HGZ1Y
         Js3l4DTGZe7TmbeTwIdlw7xMBPrM2sT4JFfNq9PQrYMo18fUFIEg/P5DAdpLU1hW6mTT
         TZmw016skAUjJmeIqRtDyJEPpxmS5LI6rAr58to+xeyo/1nNq4ITM1xtrYmqIWC8KCsL
         fkvHZKtA41zaU+UWkAZMNCoHpnVPRz8Xciek1ykWl/azO3SO6OhkEZ2GfcX4UvA9GnE6
         7Fgl4v4znQ5rLIoMFNBLhMURjyjVS1CmHcWLnHOyN9kdt1rHhwU03LoDIafPdtLNuIxd
         YGlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02jLJWCOUhx8IC4RF31HWJiGuY3lIWbsDwPh1PM9jcKZVY/saYqz+0zdSXGm0ISINrfgBj9vSaPGy5GbA==
X-Received: by 10.200.45.75 with SMTP id o11mr69236842qta.254.1481121094367;
 Wed, 07 Dec 2016 06:31:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.168.73 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 06:31:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <01000158d9a58631-0740901a-b9c4-4ead-85db-eff606f881e8-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References: <01000158d9a58631-0740901a-b9c4-4ead-85db-eff606f881e8-000000@email.amazonses.com>
From: Kasper Daniel Hansen <kasperdanielhansen@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 09:31:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC2h7uuAjo13ApfcGJZ3Hc3Q=Fd5CJ552gh=2sqX=6Qizo0+=A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bioc] minfi preprocessQuantile problem
To: reply+03243bc9+code@bioconductor.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142b174b2fed20543126045
```

Hi Kasper, Thanks for bringing this to our attention. We have identified the problem and are working on a solution. Thank you! Greg

Hi Folks, This issue has been resolved. Thanks for your patience. Greg