Annotation of downstream in ChIPseeker
0
0
Entering edit mode
@user-24527
Last seen 2.9 years ago
Hongkou

Hi,

I am confused about the annotation of downstream region and it's priority in ChIPseeker. By default downstream defined from TTS to +3kb, and in my understanding, peaks overlapped with this region will be annotated as downstream if the priority of downstream is set to the first. However, nothing changed when I do that. There is my example:

Firstly, I annotated data using default priority(c("Promoter", "5UTR", "3UTR", "Exon", "Intron", "Downstream", "Intergenic"))

peakAnnolist <- lapply(samplefiles, annotatePeak, TxDb = txdb, tssRegion = c(-1000, 1000), annoDb = "org.Mm.eg.db")
# part results 
GRanges object with 2 ranges and 12 metadata columns:
      seqnames            ranges strand |                                     annotation   geneChr geneStart   geneEnd geneLength geneStrand      geneId
         <Rle>         <IRanges>  <Rle> |                                    <character> <integer> <integer> <integer>  <integer>  <integer> <character>
  [1]    chr11 28692672-28694373      * | Exon (ENSMUST00000146554.1/72818, exon 3 of 3)        11  28681564  28693276      11713          1       72818
  [2]    chr11 28697582-28698686      * |                              Distal Intergenic        11  28681564  28693276      11713          1       72818
              transcriptId distanceToTSS            ENSEMBL        SYMBOL                   GENENAME
               <character>     <numeric>        <character>   <character>                <character>
  [1] ENSMUST00000146554.1         11108 ENSMUSG00000084966 2810471M01Rik RIKEN cDNA 2810471M01 gene
  [2] ENSMUST00000146554.1         16018 ENSMUSG00000084966 2810471M01Rik RIKEN cDNA 2810471M01 gene

enter image description here

Peak(28692672-28694373) was overlapped with the geneEnd site and annotated as Exon(consistent with the IGV visualization). But I hoped that peaks like this could be annotated as downstream. Then I set the genomicAnnotationPriority to c("Promoter","Downstream", "5UTR", "3UTR", "Exon", "Intron", "Intergenic"):

peakAnnolist <- lapply(samplefiles, annotatePeak, TxDb = txdb, tssRegion = c(-1000, 1000), annoDb = "org.Mm.eg.db", 
                       genomicAnnotationPriority = c("Promoter","Downstream", "5UTR", "3UTR", "Intron",  "Intergenic"))
# part results
GRanges object with 2 ranges and 12 metadata columns:
      seqnames            ranges strand |                                     annotation   geneChr geneStart   geneEnd geneLength geneStrand      geneId
         <Rle>         <IRanges>  <Rle> |                                    <character> <integer> <integer> <integer>  <integer>  <integer> <character>
  [1]    chr11 28692672-28694373      * | Exon (ENSMUST00000146554.1/72818, exon 3 of 3)        11  28681564  28693276      11713          1       72818
  [2]    chr11 28697582-28698686      * |                              Distal Intergenic        11  28681564  28693276      11713          1       72818
              transcriptId distanceToTSS            ENSEMBL        SYMBOL                   GENENAME
               <character>     <numeric>        <character>   <character>                <character>
  [1] ENSMUST00000146554.1         11108 ENSMUSG00000084966 2810471M01Rik RIKEN cDNA 2810471M01 gene
  [2] ENSMUST00000146554.1         16018 ENSMUSG00000084966 2810471M01Rik RIKEN cDNA 2810471M01 gene

You can see that the result was same as the previous. And not only this peak, all the annotation results did not change. I also tried to remove the Exon from genomicAnnotationPriority, however, I failed again as it was just become 'Distal Intergenic'.

What should I do to solve this problem?

Thanks!

downstream Priority ChIPseeker • 1.0k views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 866 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6