Search
Question: Multiple comparisons for DE analysis with DESeq2
0
gravatar for francesco.gandolfi
6 months ago by
francesco.gandolfi0 wrote:

Hi guys,

Probably my problem is not so complex but reasoning about the appropriate settings to test differential expression is often a source of confusion for me. Briefly, I wanted to test differentially expressed miRNA from miRNA-seq data. My dataset is composed by 8 samples in total, subdivided in 4 classes of 2 samples (replicates) each. I have 4 sample classes since the experimental design has two different factors with two conditions for each factor.

sample cell_component type
sample 1 (rep1) intracellular  Wt
sample 2 (rep2) intracellular  Wt
sample 3 (rep1) intracellular   mut
sample 4 (rep2) intracellular  mut
sample 5 (rep1) exosome Wt
sample 6 (rep2) exosome Wt
sample 7 (rep1) exosome mut
sample 8 (rep2) exosome mut

 

Now I just would like to use DESeq2 package to test DE miRNAs in the following comparisons: 

Exosome_wt vs Intracellular_wt

Exosome_mut vs Exosome_wt

Intracellular_mut vs Intracellular_wt

Exosome_mut vs Intracellular_mut

Obviously, the 'intracellular' condition refers to intracellular miRNAs and 'exosome' refers to miRNA expression from exosomes.

My main doubt is how to test these contrasts with DESeq2. Initially I supposed to create the DESeqDataSet object using both the experimental factors:

dds <-DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData = ReadCountTable, colData = sampleinfo, design = Cell_component ~ Type).

But then, if I understood correctly, the results function of DESeq2 will extract logFC/pvalue/adj.pval only for comparisons between levels of one factor, for example: 

res <- results(dds, contrast = c("cell_component", "exosome", "intracellular") OR

res <- results(dds, contrast=c("type", "mut", "wt")

But in my case, I wanted to test DE between combinations of factors. One solution I have tried: creating a new column in colData containing for each sample the corresponding combination of factors: intracellular_wt, intracellular_wt, intracellular_mut, intracellular_mut, exosome_wt, etc... and then using results to extract each time the output of each comparison on the new column:

for example:

res <- results(dds, contrast = c("new_column", "exosome_wt", "intracellular_wt") ).

However, I'm not sure at all this is the correct procedure. Can somebody help me?

Thanks a lot,

Francesco

 

ADD COMMENTlink modified 6 months ago by Gavin Kelly510 • written 6 months ago by francesco.gandolfi0
0
gravatar for Gavin Kelly
6 months ago by
Gavin Kelly510
United Kingdom / London / Francis Crick Institute
Gavin Kelly510 wrote:

Yes, I think your approach of adding a combination factor (design = ~ new_column) is a correct way to carry out the analysis.  It would be possible to achieve something similar if you had a design = ~Cell_component * Type with an interaction, but it wouldn't be as transparent as the approach you've suggested.  (I'm not sure your 'design = Cell_component ~ Type' is a typo, as generally DESeq2 designs are specified without a left-hand-side to the formula).  

One warning is that if you go on and look at set intersections of these genelists (e.g. mutation-differential in exosome but not in intracellular), then you're doubling up on potential statistical errors, and there are two-way designs which answer similar questions in one pass, so may be more appropriate - a local statistician would be able to advise.

ADD COMMENTlink written 6 months ago by Gavin Kelly510

Hi Gavin,

ok, for the moment I will try the first approach. Thanks a lot for your help and your suggestions!

fran

 

ADD REPLYlink written 6 months ago by francesco.gandolfi0
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.2.0
Traffic: 186 users visited in the last hour