nthreads option does NOT work in rsubread featureCounts
1
0
Entering edit mode
shao ▴ 100
@shao-6241
Last seen 6.3 years ago
Germany

I increased  nthethreads value in featureCounts but the running time didnt decrease.

I used the following command:
subread_res <- featureCounts(files, annot.ext = GTF_file,
                             isGTFAnnotationFile = TRUE, nthreads = X,
                             countMultiMappingReads = TRUE, fraction = TRUE)

 

First run with 5 threads, 2.7 min used

//========================== featureCounts setting ===========================\\
||                                                                            ||
||             Input files : 1 BAM file                                       ||
||                           S /Result ... ||
||                                                                            ||
||      Dir for temp files : .                                                ||
||                 Threads : 5                                                ||
||                   Level : meta-feature level                               ||
||              Paired-end : no                                               ||
||         Strand specific : no                                               ||
||      Multimapping reads : counted                                          ||
|| Multi-overlapping reads : not counted                                      ||
||   Min overlapping bases : 1                                                ||
||                                                                            ||
\\===================== http://subread.sourceforge.net/ ======================//

//================================= Running ==================================\\
||                                                                            ||
|| Load annotation file us_muscu ... ||
||    Features : 729264                                                       ||
||    Meta-features : 48795                                                   ||
||    Chromosomes/contigs : 45                                                ||
||                                                                            ||
|| Process BAM file sults/01_STAR_r ... ||
||    Single-end reads are included.                                          ||
||    Assign reads to features...                                             ||
||    Total reads : 53383794                                                  ||
||    Successfully assigned reads : 12345398 (23.1%)                          ||
||    Running time : 2.70 minutes                                             ||
||                                                                            ||
||                         Read assignment finished.                          ||
||                                                                            ||
\\===================== http://subread.sourceforge.net/ ======================//

 

then with 1 thread, 2.73 min. Nearly no difference. How are your data with the nthreads? Suggestions? Thanks!

        ==========     _____ _    _ ____  _____  ______          _____  
        =====         / ____| |  | |  _ \|  __ \|  ____|   /\   |  __ \
          =====      | (___ | |  | | |_) | |__) | |__     /  \  | |  | |
            ====      \___ \| |  | |  _ <|  _  /|  __|   / /\ \ | |  | |
              ====    ____) | |__| | |_) | | \ \| |____ / ____ \| |__| |
        ==========   |_____/ \____/|____/|_|  \_\______/_/    \_\_____/
       Rsubread 1.26.1

//========================== featureCounts setting ===========================\\
||                                                                            ||
||             Input files : 1 BAM file                                       ||
||                           S s/Result ... ||
||                                                                            ||
||      Dir for temp files : .                                                ||
||                 Threads : 1                                                ||
||                   Level : meta-feature level                               ||
||              Paired-end : no                                               ||
||         Strand specific : no                                               ||
||      Multimapping reads : counted                                          ||
|| Multi-overlapping reads : not counted                                      ||
||   Min overlapping bases : 1                                                ||
||                                                                            ||
\\===================== http://subread.sourceforge.net/ ======================//

//================================= Running ==================================\\
||                                                                            ||
|| Load annotation file ensembl_86/Mus_muscu ... ||
||    Features : 729264                                                       ||
||    Meta-features : 48795                                                   ||
||    Chromosomes/contigs : 45                                                ||
||                                                                            ||
|| Process BAM file Results/01_STAR_r ... ||
||    Single-end reads are included.                                          ||
||    Assign reads to features...                                             ||
||    Total reads : 53383794                                                  ||
||    Successfully assigned reads : 12345398 (23.1%)                          ||
||    Running time : 2.73 minutes                                             ||
||                                                                            ||
||                         Read assignment finished.                          ||
||                                                                            ||
\\===================== http://subread.sourceforge.net/ ======================//

Bellow is the session info

> sessionInfo()
R version 3.4.1 (2017-06-30)
Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
Running under: CentOS Linux 7 (Core)

Matrix products: default
BLAS: .linuxbrew/Cellar/r/3.4.1_2/lib/R/lib/libRblas.so
LAPACK: .linuxbrew/Cellar/r/3.4.1_2/lib/R/lib/libRlapack.so

locale:
 [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8       LC_NUMERIC=C              
 [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8        LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8    
 [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8    LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8   
 [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8       LC_NAME=C                 
 [9] LC_ADDRESS=C               LC_TELEPHONE=C            
[11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C       

attached base packages:
[1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods   base     

other attached packages:
[1] Rsubread_1.26.1

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] compiler_3.4.1

 

rsubread • 2.6k views
ADD COMMENT
3
Entering edit mode
Wei Shi ★ 3.6k
@wei-shi-2183
Last seen 10 days ago
Australia/Melbourne/Olivia Newton-John …

First you will need to check if more than one CPU core was used when you ran with multiple threads. You can run 'top' command under linux shell to see how many cpu cores you are using.

Another possibility is that most of featureCounts running time was spent on reading in and decompressing your bam file and running with multi threads wouldn't help for this.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks for the quick reply! I saw more than 100% CPU usage in the later stage of featureCounts (macosx binary version), the second reason explained the time usage. Would be great to have faster read for bam files.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

It is true for me too that the majority of the time is spent in reading/decompressing. For this reason it would be nice if Rsubread::featureCounts allowed some degree to parallelization at this level. Ideally it might support new parameter, nbams, being how many .bams to process at a time (some smaller number than nthreads). If I could, on my compute server, I would probably call:

     featureCounts(nbams = 5, nthreads = 40, ...)

... without getting IO bound.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks for the suggestion. We will have an investigation about this.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 576 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6