Analysis design for DESeq2
1
0
Entering edit mode
gairoju • 0
@595325ca
Last seen 3.2 years ago

Hello there,

Although this type of question would have been asked, let me post here as I couldn't find exact answer. We're facing the same kind of situation discussed in the vignette.

One of groups shows high variability, and we finally came to know the group prepared by different batches. Say, we have multiple groups (A, B, and C) with 2 conditions (X, Y) and 3 replicates for each. We'd like to list DEGs between condition X and Y in each group, and plan to do some posthoc analysis. Group A and B came from the same batch, and show reasonable clusters. However, in group C there is a high variability across conditions, and we came to know that group was prepared differently, say in batch 2 and 3.

Group-replicate-Condition-batch

A - 1 - X - batch1

A - 2 - X - batch1

..

B - 2 - Y - batch1

B - 3 - Y - batch1

C - 1 - X - batch2

C - 2 - X - batch3

C - 3 - X - batch3

C - 1 - Y - batch3

C - 2 - Y - batch2

C - 3 - Y - batch3

We excluded C for the analysis of A and B like explained in the vignette. Looks reasonable result.

When analyzing C, what do you think the best possible approach is?

  1. Just analyzing group C (e.g. ~ batch + condition) without A and B.
  2. Comparing A, B, and C altogether (this means giving up considering batches...), and then just extract DEG for the group C.

Condition effect across group is not the current interest, so splitting C could be better (not ideal, though).

Please advise, experts!

DifferentialExpression DESeq2 • 596 views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
@mikelove
Last seen 17 hours ago
United States

If group C has batches with considerable variability, I would recommend what you've done for A and B, and then (1).

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 682 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6