User: pedrostrusso
pedrostrusso • 30
- Reputation:
- 30
- Status:
- New User
- Location:
- Last seen:
- 9 months, 1 week ago
- Joined:
- 2 years, 5 months ago
- Email:
- p***********@gmail.com
Posts by pedrostrusso
<prev
• 3 results •
page 1 of 1 •
next >
1
vote
2
answers
710
views
2
answers
... You're right, it doesn't look like you need the apply_vst parameter. About the qqplot, it looks like you could go either way... maybe Spearman could be a little more on the safe side, but I don't think Pearson would be a bad choice either.
About the group comparisons, as you said before, both packa ...
written 9 months ago by
pedrostrusso • 30
1
vote
2
answers
710
views
2
answers
... Hi Lin, sorry, I didn't notice the 5000 genes you used as input. Since you previously filtered your dataset, did you remember to include the *filter*=FALSE parameter in your *cemitool* function call? Otherwise, the function will filter your already filtered dataset, which would probably cause some b ...
written 9 months ago by
pedrostrusso • 30
1
vote
2
answers
710
views
2
answers
... Hi Lin, thanks for using CEMiTool!
CEMiTool's automatic filter is, as you may have noticed, quite stringent, and it tends to leave in the analysis mostly genes with significant activity in their given pathways. This is probably why you found that all your modules ended up being differentially expre ...
written 9 months ago by
pedrostrusso • 30
Latest awards to pedrostrusso
No awards yet. Soon to come :-)
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User
Agreement
and Privacy
Policy.
Powered by Biostar
version 16.09
Traffic: 238 users visited in the last hour