User: snguyen268
snguyen268 • 0
- Reputation:
- 0
- Status:
- New User
- Last seen:
- 12 months ago
- Joined:
- 1 year, 7 months ago
- Email:
- s*********@gmail.com
Profile information, website and location are not shown for new users.
This helps us discourage the inappropriate use of our site.
Posts by snguyen268
<prev
• 4 results •
page 1 of 1 •
next >
0
votes
0
answers
327
views
0
answers
... Hi all,
I am creating a .cls file for my GSEA analysis and see the below error. Can anyone suggest a solution?
I create the file using TeXworks. The file looks like this:
37 2 1
#CD69neg CD69pos
CD69neg CD69pos CD69pos CD69pos CD69neg CD69pos CD69pos CD69pos CD69pos CD69neg CD69neg CD69neg CD69 ...
written 15 months ago by
snguyen268 • 0
0
votes
2
answers
424
views
2
answers
... Hi all,
Thanks for your reply. I don't think it is the Ensembl archive sites either because most of the results are pretty much similar to what I got before.
However, there are differences that I can't really reconcile.
For example, the term "mRNA catabolic process" had 218 annotated term before, ...
written 16 months ago by
snguyen268 • 0
0
votes
2
answers
424
views
2
answers
... Hi all,
Thank you for your answer.
I have upgraded my biomaRt to the newest version. It seems like somehow the GO annotation is different that affects my results. Does ENSEMBL modify their archive servers as well?
...
written 16 months ago by
snguyen268 • 0
0
votes
2
answers
424
views
2
answers
... Hi all,
I have a quite novice question:
I am aware that ENSEMBL has recently release a new version (ENSEMBL 91). Since then I have been having trouble reproducing my results from the GO analysis (using topGO package). Potentially, this could be due to me upgrading Bioconductor as well (but I think ...
written 16 months ago by
snguyen268 • 0
Latest awards to snguyen268
No awards yet. Soon to come :-)
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User
Agreement
and Privacy
Policy.
Powered by Biostar
version 16.09
Traffic: 285 users visited in the last hour