updated 7 weeks ago by
Gordon Smyth
50k
•
written 7 weeks ago by
Faisal
•
0
0
votes
6
replies
370
views
0
votes
2
replies
213
views
updated 8 weeks ago by
vvvc360work2
•
0
•
written 8 weeks ago by
Karlison
•
0
0
votes
2
replies
265
views
1
vote
2
replies
119
views
3 days ago • updated 2 days ago
Daniel
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
197
views
updated 3 months ago by
James W. MacDonald
65k
•
written 3 months ago by
jianyang.liu
•
0
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
JKim
•
0
The 1st model has an interaction term, but the 2nd model doesn't have the interaction term. That makes the difference.
Comment: Ensembl plants at annotationHub?
by
Daniele
•
0
Hi,
I'm using Ensembl Plants release 59 with the IWGSC RefSeq v1.1 gene annotation.
Thanks a lot for replying so quickly!
Comment: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
swbarnes2
★
1.4k
If you restrict yourself to, say, genes with a baseMean > 50, are the numerical differences between the two designs significant?
Comment: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
shaunpeterson
•
0
The images I tried to attach didn't attach. Here is the PCA (MDS) of all the samples, with the Cortex outlier highlighed.
India, 30 minutes ago
Greece, 50 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 1 hour ago
Poland, 1 hour ago
United States, 1 hour ago
India, 30 minutes ago
Greece, 50 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 1 hour ago
Poland, 1 hour ago
United States, 1 hour ago
Traffic: 430 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6