written 17 months ago by
Bioinformatics-414
•
0
3
votes
3
replies
987
views
3
votes
4
replies
1.5k
views
updated 2.2 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 2.2 years ago by
dario.beraldi
•
0
1
vote
1
reply
771
views
updated 2.3 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 2.3 years ago by
BT
▴
10
1
vote
2
replies
1.1k
views
1
vote
3
replies
1.5k
views
updated 2.3 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 2.4 years ago by
celiburgos
•
0
4
votes
4
replies
2.1k
views
updated 5 months ago by
Gordon Smyth
50k
•
written 2.4 years ago by
mohammedtoufiq91
▴
10
6
votes
4
replies
1.5k
views
updated 2.5 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 2.5 years ago by
rafaelsolersanblas
▴
50
2
votes
4
replies
2.5k
views
0
votes
3
replies
2.3k
views
updated 2.7 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 2.7 years ago by
Diamond
•
0
1
vote
1
reply
855
views
updated 3.2 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 3.2 years ago by
Fischer-philipp
▴
30
8
votes
8
replies
1.3k
views
1
vote
2
replies
816
views
updated 4.4 years ago by
Steve Lianoglou
★
13k
•
written 4.4 years ago by
zhang.jianhai
▴
10
0
votes
1
reply
2.7k
views
updated 4.6 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 4.6 years ago by
juheon.maeng
•
0
1
vote
7
replies
1.2k
views
updated 4.8 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 4.8 years ago by
mschmidt
▴
10
0
votes
3
replies
793
views
updated 5.1 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 5.1 years ago by
zhang.jianhai
▴
10
0
votes
15
replies
2.8k
views
6.0 years ago
crowsreign42
•
0
0
votes
4
replies
2.0k
views
1
vote
2
replies
971
views
0
votes
6
replies
3.2k
views
6.7 years ago • updated 6.6 years ago
lirongrossmann
▴
80
0
votes
9
replies
1.8k
views
2
votes
2
replies
2.7k
views
updated 7.2 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 7.2 years ago by
Zach Roe
▴
10
6
votes
4
replies
3.7k
views
updated 7.8 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 7.8 years ago by
longwoodSequencer
•
0
0
votes
3
replies
7.4k
views
8.2 years ago
lanhuong
▴
20
3
votes
4
replies
2.1k
views
2
votes
5
replies
2.7k
views
updated 8.6 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 8.6 years ago by
sjmonkley
▴
40
4
votes
4
replies
2.2k
views
updated 9.0 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 9.0 years ago by
snsansom
▴
20
0
votes
1
reply
2.9k
views
updated 9.1 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 9.1 years ago by
katja
•
0
Recent ...
Replies
Answer: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
Michael Love
42k
Yes there can be small numerical differences in the estimated quantities because of how the algorithms decide to stop iterating.
Answer: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
Michael Love
42k
Removing samples from one group nevertheless changes the variance estimation (dispersion) for all comparisons. So you could have pushed one…
Comment: Ensembl plants at annotationHub?
by
Daniele
•
0
Hi,
I'm using Ensembl Plants release 59 with the IWGSC RefSeq v1.1 gene annotation.
Thanks a lot for replying so quickly!
Comment: Numerical differences in DESeq2 output depending on different design matrix cons
by
swbarnes2
★
1.4k
If you restrict yourself to, say, genes with a baseMean > 50, are the numerical differences between the two designs significant?
Comment: DESeq2- Mysterious interaction suppresses DEGs
by
shaunpeterson
•
0
The images I tried to attach didn't attach. Here is the PCA (MDS) of all the samples, with the Cortex outlier highlighed.
Sweden, just now
United States, 11 minutes ago
UPF, Barcelona, Spain, 11 minutes ago
United States, 32 minutes ago
Ireland, 1 hour ago
Sweden, just now
United States, 11 minutes ago
UPF, Barcelona, Spain, 11 minutes ago
United States, 32 minutes ago
Ireland, 1 hour ago
Traffic: 323 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6