Limma model for paired and pool together
1
0
Entering edit mode
b.nota ▴ 370
@bnota-7379
Last seen 4.3 years ago
Netherlands

I would like to use limma (voom or trend) for my RNAseq analysis, and I am wondering how to correctly model my data. I have 2 different cells (hi and lo) from 2 donors, so I want to use a paired design. However, there is also a pool of more donors (hi and lo). How can I include this correctly in my design?

This here is my targets file:

Sample    Donor    Cell
D1_lo    D1    lo
D1_hi    D1    hi
D2_lo    D2    lo
D2_hi    D2    hi
Pool_lo    Pool    lo
Pool_hi    Pool    hi

 

limma design rnaseq • 1.1k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
@ryan-c-thompson-5618
Last seen 9 weeks ago
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai…

The main problem I see is that the pooled samples would be expected to have lower biological variance, since they are effectively the average of several donors. You can model this sample heteroskedasticity using a design of ~Cell + Donor and then using voomWithQualityWeights. Make sure to set plot=TRUE and verify that the Pool samples have higher weights (i.e. lower variance) than the others. If this is not the case, you need to investigate further, since the data is not matching your expectations based on the design.

ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode

Agreed, the paired model ~Cell + Donor is correct here.

There's no heteroskedasticity issue here though because any variation between Donors is being removed by the paired model. The analysis of variation is purely within Donor, so the degree of variability in baseline expression from one Donor to another doesn't enter into the analysis.

So it's just an ordinary paired analysis without any special considerations (assuming that the pool doesn't include D1 and D2).

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

The pool is made of 3 other donors, so this will work for me! Thanks both.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I'm not sure I follow the logic that there's no heteroskedasticity issue. I would expect the pooled samples to have smaller residuals on average, although perhaps multiple pools would be required to show this effect.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 579 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6