use only lib size as normalizing factor in edgeR
1
0
Entering edit mode
Udi Landau ▴ 30
@udi-landau-9726
Last seen 4.9 years ago

Hello, 

I would like to use only the lib size as normalizing factor in edgeR, so I am doing this:

cds <- DGEList(counts = counts, group = group, norm.factors = MyNormFactors)

I skip the 

cds <- calcNormFactors(cds, method = "none")

Because It will bring the norm factor back to 1..

and I continue with calculating dispersion and doing the exact test.

What is seems to me strange is that the pseudo count look the same as the original count.

Isn't it supposed to change?

When I use no normalization (factor = 1)  the pseudo count do change a little..

Just want to know if this is the right way so I could trust my results.. 

edger • 978 views
ADD COMMENT
2
Entering edit mode
Aaron Lun ★ 28k
@alun
Last seen 49 minutes ago
The city by the bay

There's several issues in your post.

  • If you want to do library size normalization, then don't specify norm.factors in the DGEList call. Having all normalization factors equal to 1 means that edgeR will use the log-library sizes directly as offsets, without calculating effective library sizes.
  • It doesn't matter if you skip calcNormFactors or not, your normalization factors should already be 1.
  • All currently recommended edgeR pipelines use glmQLFit and glmQLFTest instead of exactTest. The quasi-likelihood GLM framework is more accurate, more flexible and faster than "classic" edgeR - better in every way.
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thank you!

Can you tell me what would you recommend to use for plotting the data?

I understand that the pseudo count is not suitable? 

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

See Section 2.15 of the edgeR User's Guide ("Clustering, heatmaps etc").

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 648 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6