Subsetting limma TestResults
0
0
Entering edit mode
@gordon-smyth
Last seen 1 hour ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia
> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:47:09 +0200 > From: Michael Strehle <mstrehle at="" mdc-berlin.de=""> > Subject: [BioC] Subsetting limma TestResults > To: bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > > Dear all, > > I recently encountered a problem subsetting limma TestResults on a > new Bioconductor install. If I do > > > results<-decideTests(fit3,adjust="holm") > > results[results<0] > > to extract differentially expressed genes from a MOE4302 fit I will > get a matrix with results and Affy ID > > > results[results<0] > 1427262_at 1427263_at 1436717_x_at ... > -1 -1 -1 ... Did limma ever work like this? I don't think it did. I think it's more likely that you've actually done slightly different things in the two limma versions. There are some subtleties in the way that subsetting works in R, which I explain below. > in R 2.1.1, limma 2.0.8 on OSX 10.4.6/PPC, but > > > results[results<0] > [1] -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 ... > > in R 2.3.0, limma 2.7.3 on OSX 10.4.6/PPC, that is, the results > without Affy ID . In limma, the output from decideTests() is an object of class "TestResults", and this is matrix-like. The method of subsetting you are using (dimensionless subsetting) coerces the result to be an ordinary vector. Hence any attributes such as rownames must be lost because vectors don't have rows or columns. This is how R works, and it has nothing particularly to do with limma. If you want to preserve rownames, you must treat the object as a matrix, i.e., you must treat it as having two dimensions. If 'results' has only one column, you could use results[results<0,] If there are more columns, you would need results[results[,1]<0,1] to get the first column subsetted. Alternatively, results <- results[,1] results[results<0] would also preserve rownames, because the results[,1] drops the matrix down to a vector with the former rownames becoming ordinary names. Best wishes Gordon > Same if I use subset(results, results<0). Since I really would like > to retain the Affy IDs in the subset for further annotation - am I > missing something here, and is there a way to make this work again ? > > > Thanks, > > Michael
Annotation affy limma Annotation affy limma • 1.2k views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 624 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6