Finding similarities and differences for more than one catergory
1
0
Entering edit mode
Daniel Brewer ★ 1.9k
@daniel-brewer-1791
Last seen 9.7 years ago
Hi, I have results from a series of 2-colour microarray experiements that compare reference RNA to RNA from cells that fall into 4 catergories: Cancer CD133+ Normal CD133+ Cancer CD133- Normal CD133- What I would like to find genes that are: 1) Significantly different from the reference RNA AND 2) either (in both CD133+/- seperately) i) significantly different between cancer and normal or ii) significantly _similar_ between cancer and normal I have been thinking of using the following strategy: 1) Treat CD133+ and - results separately 2) Use results from lmFit to filter out genes that are not significantly different from reference RNA in BOTH Cancer and normal 3) Perform a t-test between cancer and normal results and take genes with p>0.05 as significantly different and p>0.95 as significantly similar. Is this a reasonable approach or would it be better to use ANOVA or regression analysis. To add to the complexity at some point I would also like to compare the CD133+/- samples Many Thanks -- ************************************************************** Daniel Brewer, Ph.D. Institute of Cancer Research
Microarray Cancer Microarray Cancer • 671 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@sean-davis-490
Last seen 4 months ago
United States
On Thursday 14 September 2006 07:11, Daniel Brewer wrote: > Hi, > > I have results from a series of 2-colour microarray experiements that > compare reference RNA to RNA from cells that fall into 4 catergories: > Cancer CD133+ > Normal CD133+ > Cancer CD133- > Normal CD133- > > What I would like to find genes that are: > 1) Significantly different from the reference RNA > AND > 2) either (in both CD133+/- seperately) > i) significantly different between cancer and normal > or ii) significantly _similar_ between cancer and normal > > I have been thinking of using the following strategy: > 1) Treat CD133+ and - results separately > 2) Use results from lmFit to filter out genes that are not significantly > different from reference RNA in BOTH Cancer and normal > 3) Perform a t-test between cancer and normal results and take genes > with p>0.05 as significantly different and p>0.95 as significantly similar. There is not a good test to show that a gene is "unchanged" between two groups, so point 2.ii doesn't really make sense. In hypothesis testing terms, using t-tests or the like allow you to "regect the null hypothesis" with a given amount of certainty. However, NOT rejecting the null hypothesis (of differential expression) is NOT the same as proving the null hypothesis, no matter how non-significant the p-values are. > Is this a reasonable approach or would it be better to use ANOVA or > regression analysis. To add to the complexity at some point I would > also like to compare the CD133+/- samples Using all the data simultaneously is the better way to go, so use limma (or some other package) to treat the data as the two-factor experiment that it is. Sean
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Sean Davis wrote: > On Thursday 14 September 2006 07:11, Daniel Brewer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have results from a series of 2-colour microarray experiements that >> compare reference RNA to RNA from cells that fall into 4 catergories: >> Cancer CD133+ >> Normal CD133+ >> Cancer CD133- >> Normal CD133- >> >> What I would like to find genes that are: >> 1) Significantly different from the reference RNA >> AND >> 2) either (in both CD133+/- seperately) >> i) significantly different between cancer and normal >> or ii) significantly _similar_ between cancer and normal >> >> I have been thinking of using the following strategy: >> 1) Treat CD133+ and - results separately >> 2) Use results from lmFit to filter out genes that are not significantly >> different from reference RNA in BOTH Cancer and normal >> 3) Perform a t-test between cancer and normal results and take genes >> with p>0.05 as significantly different and p>0.95 as significantly similar. > > There is not a good test to show that a gene is "unchanged" between two > groups, so point 2.ii doesn't really make sense. In hypothesis testing > terms, using t-tests or the like allow you to "regect the null hypothesis" > with a given amount of certainty. However, NOT rejecting the null hypothesis > (of differential expression) is NOT the same as proving the null hypothesis, > no matter how non-significant the p-values are. > >> Is this a reasonable approach or would it be better to use ANOVA or >> regression analysis. To add to the complexity at some point I would >> also like to compare the CD133+/- samples > > Using all the data simultaneously is the better way to go, so use limma (or > some other package) to treat the data as the two-factor experiment that it > is. > > Sean Thanks for the quick reply. I must admit that I am slightly confused by the fact that there is no way to test that a gene is unchanged between two groups. Can't you just set the null hypothesis that the two groups are different? Or is that not possible. Is there any other statistical similarity metrics that I could use? Many thanks again. Dan -- ************************************************************** Daniel Brewer, Ph.D. Institute of Cancer Research Molecular Carcinogenesis MUCRC 15 Cotswold Road Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 20 8722 4109 Fax: +44 (0) 20 8722 4141 Email: daniel.brewer at icr.ac.uk
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 378 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6