gcrma version differences
1
0
Entering edit mode
@karen-vranizan-868
Last seen 9.6 years ago
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/attachments/20070222/ c468d7e6/attachment.pl
• 622 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@zhijin-jean-wu-1370
Last seen 9.6 years ago
I do not remember the exact mapping between changes and version numbers. But one major change is the estimate of background parameters from a windowed quantile to a loess curve. On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Karen Vranizan wrote: > Hello. I recently re-ran gcrma on my dataset with version 2.6. Why are the results so different from those I got with version 1.1? I know there were large changes between 1.0 and 1.1, but I can't find documentation explaining the changes I am seeing with the recent gcrma. I am using simple gcrma with default arguments. Could someone direct me to a document that clearly lists the methodological changes that were introduced to the gcrma algorithm for all relevant versions? Thank you. > > > Karen Vranizan > Functional Genomics Lab > 261A Life Sciences Addition > Mail Code #3200 > UC Berkeley, CA 94720-3200 > > Phone: 510-642-7520 > Fax: 510-643-2685 > email: vranizan at berkeley.edu > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 666 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6