Suitability of normalizeBetweenArrays? - arrays with very different characteristics
1
0
Entering edit mode
@gordon-smyth
Last seen 52 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia
Dear John, You do need to normalize between arrays if you want to do a single channel analysis. It is true that normalization is more difficult if there are very large differences between samples, but you have to do the best you can. I personally use Aquantile in most cases, based on unpublished studies in my own group. Best wishes Gordon >Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:07:55 +0000 (UTC) >From: John Fowler <fowlerj at="" science.oregonstate.edu=""> >Subject: [BioC] Suitability of normalizeBetweenArrays? - arrays with > very different characteristics >To: bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > >Hello all, > >I am looking for advice on whether it is suitable to use >normalizeBetweenArrays >(in limma) in my two-color array experiment. Secondarily, if it is NOT >appropriate, would that also preclude doing a single channel analysis of my >data? It seems that the User's Guide indicates that some form of normalizing >between arrays is recommended before doing the single channel analysis. > >I have a 3x2 loop design, with three different developmental stages & two >different genotypes, four replicates each. I am using spotted long oligo >arrays, two colors. Because the two genotypes have very few expression >differences between them, but two of the developmental stages appear >to be VERY >different, the results on my arrays are also different. On arrays >in which the >same developmental stage, but different genotypes, are used, the data are >primarily clustered around M=0, distributed along the A axis. And, >as you would >expect, when the very different developmental stages of the same genotype are >used, the amount of variation in M (and presumably in A, as well, although >that's more difficult to see) is obvious in the plots. > >So, is it in-advisable to use normalizeBetweenArrays in this case? My best >guess as to the most appropriate method to use would be "Aquantile", but I am >unsure of that, as well. > >I would be happy for suggestions on these questions - > >thank you very much, >John > >John Fowler >Associate Professor >Oregon State University
Normalization Normalization • 958 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@martinschumachernovartiscom-1610
Last seen 10.2 years ago
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/attachments/20070424/ 4c91cb86/attachment.pl

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 746 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6