question about U133 plus 2.0 array
1
0
Entering edit mode
@james-anderson-1641
Last seen 9.7 years ago
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/attachments/20070624/ c192c0f6/attachment.pl
• 559 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Ben Bolstad ★ 1.2k
@ben-bolstad-1494
Last seen 6.7 years ago
One possibility could be that some of your files are in a binary format (aka version 4 or xda format) and some are in a text format (aka version 3). That would give vast file size differences. Ben On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 11:06 -0700, James Anderson wrote: > We have some data on diabetes using U133 plus 2.0 array. One question that perplexed me is that the size of the data is very different, some are around 12 mega bytes (cel files), some are even more than 30 mega bytes, I thought same type of chip should have similar size of CEL files, why they can be so different? > > Many thanks, > > James > > > --------------------------------- > Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/attachments/20070624/ 888725a7/attachment.pl
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
RMAExpress will process binary and text format cel files together with no problem if they are really from the same chip type. The same holds true for data read using ReadAffy(). Best, Ben On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 15:24 -0700, James Anderson wrote: > If that's the case, would that be possible for them to be processed together with RMA? I used RMAExpress to process files with very different size together, it seems that there is no problem with that. > > Ben Bolstad <bmb at="" bmbolstad.com=""> wrote: One possibility could be that some of your files are in a binary format > (aka version 4 or xda format) and some are in a text format (aka version > 3). That would give vast file size differences. > > Ben > > > > > On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 11:06 -0700, James Anderson wrote: > > We have some data on diabetes using U133 plus 2.0 array. One question that perplexed me is that the size of the data is very different, some are around 12 mega bytes (cel files), some are even more than 30 mega bytes, I thought same type of chip should have similar size of CEL files, why they can be so different? > > > > Many thanks, > > > > James > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Bioconductor mailing list > > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 762 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6