Do my Limma results look "normal"?
1
0
Entering edit mode
Paul Geeleher ★ 1.3k
@paul-geeleher-2679
Last seen 10.2 years ago
Hi, This is the first time I've ever analyzed a microarray experiment using Limma (or anything else for that matter) and I was hoping that somebody could look at my results and tell me if they look normal. The experiment is measuring differential expression between miRNAs of HER2+ and HER2- breast cancer tissue. There are 3 HER2+ arrays and 4 HER2- arrays and each of the 399 miRNAs is replicated 4 times in each array. TopTable() reveals the following miRNAs with a fold change above 1.5, which I thought was a reasonable cutoff: ID logFC t P.Value adj.P.Val B 273 hsa-miR-451 -4.645060 -8.226854 4.510441e-09 9.246404e-07 10.8484797 128 hsa-miR-205 3.551495 7.574564 2.370061e-08 3.239083e-06 9.2222865 13 hsa-miR-101 -2.310652 -6.569497 3.374177e-07 2.567796e-05 6.6146751 282 hsa-miR-486 -2.686910 -6.542808 3.626060e-07 2.567796e-05 6.5439656 55 hsa-miR-144 -2.890719 -5.889594 2.152998e-06 1.261042e-04 4.7952480 387 mmu-miR-463 -2.609257 -5.764143 3.042120e-06 1.559086e-04 4.4561920 388 mmu-miR-464 -2.080402 -5.696976 3.662006e-06 1.668247e-04 4.2743601 151 hsa-miR-223 -1.722956 -5.637290 4.318942e-06 1.770766e-04 4.1126276 51 hsa-miR-142-3p -3.262824 -5.397809 8.386312e-06 3.125807e-04 3.4626378 14 hsa-miR-101_MM1 -1.922710 -5.224075 1.358743e-05 4.175776e-04 2.9905370 159 hsa-miR-26b_MM2 -2.221853 -5.206724 1.425875e-05 4.175776e-04 2.9433849 236 hsa-miR-376a_MM1 -1.633555 -4.653220 6.637043e-05 1.700742e-03 1.4433277 266 hsa-miR-432* 1.512622 4.627293 7.131510e-05 1.719952e-03 1.3734422 168 hsa-miR-29b -1.954087 -4.198854 2.323860e-04 4.763912e-03 0.2280262 31 hsa-miR-126*_MM2 -1.537988 -3.209957 3.233842e-03 5.099520e-02 -2.2888897 52 hsa-miR-142-5p -1.881192 -2.831493 8.332384e-03 9.002153e-02 -3.1731794 Another person is sanity testing this data using GeneSpring and they are getting much higher p-values compared to mine. They are also taking the step of excluding quite a few of the miRNAs from the experiment based on their standard deviation across the arrays of each group. Should I be doing this also or is this taken into account by the eBayes() function or lmFit()? If you are interested the script I wrote to do the analysis is here: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor/1 8032/match=miRNA Thanks for any advice, -Paul.
Microarray Cancer Breast limma GeneSpring Microarray Cancer Breast limma GeneSpring • 1.3k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
rgentleman ★ 5.5k
@rgentleman-7725
Last seen 9.6 years ago
United States
Hi Paul, Please check the posting guide and provide us with the information requested there (like sessionInfo and the commands you ran). And I typically don't give any advice (excpet to follow the posting guide) to people who don't use signatures that identify them. Robrt Paul Geeleher wrote: > Hi, > > This is the first time I've ever analyzed a microarray experiment > using Limma (or anything else for that matter) and I was hoping that > somebody could look at my results and tell me if they look normal. > > The experiment is measuring differential expression between miRNAs of > HER2+ and HER2- breast cancer tissue. There are 3 HER2+ arrays and 4 > HER2- arrays and each of the 399 miRNAs is replicated 4 times in each > array. > > TopTable() reveals the following miRNAs with a fold change above 1.5, > which I thought was a reasonable cutoff: > > ID logFC t P.Value adj.P.Val B > 273 hsa-miR-451 -4.645060 -8.226854 4.510441e-09 9.246404e-07 10.8484797 > 128 hsa-miR-205 3.551495 7.574564 2.370061e-08 3.239083e-06 9.2222865 > 13 hsa-miR-101 -2.310652 -6.569497 3.374177e-07 2.567796e-05 6.6146751 > 282 hsa-miR-486 -2.686910 -6.542808 3.626060e-07 2.567796e-05 6.5439656 > 55 hsa-miR-144 -2.890719 -5.889594 2.152998e-06 1.261042e-04 4.7952480 > 387 mmu-miR-463 -2.609257 -5.764143 3.042120e-06 1.559086e-04 4.4561920 > 388 mmu-miR-464 -2.080402 -5.696976 3.662006e-06 1.668247e-04 4.2743601 > 151 hsa-miR-223 -1.722956 -5.637290 4.318942e-06 1.770766e-04 4.1126276 > 51 hsa-miR-142-3p -3.262824 -5.397809 8.386312e-06 3.125807e-04 3.4626378 > 14 hsa-miR-101_MM1 -1.922710 -5.224075 1.358743e-05 4.175776e-04 2.9905370 > 159 hsa-miR-26b_MM2 -2.221853 -5.206724 1.425875e-05 4.175776e-04 2.9433849 > 236 hsa-miR-376a_MM1 -1.633555 -4.653220 6.637043e-05 1.700742e-03 1.4433277 > 266 hsa-miR-432* 1.512622 4.627293 7.131510e-05 1.719952e-03 1.3734422 > 168 hsa-miR-29b -1.954087 -4.198854 2.323860e-04 4.763912e-03 0.2280262 > 31 hsa-miR-126*_MM2 -1.537988 -3.209957 3.233842e-03 5.099520e-02 -2.2888897 > 52 hsa-miR-142-5p -1.881192 -2.831493 8.332384e-03 9.002153e-02 -3.1731794 > > > Another person is sanity testing this data using GeneSpring and they > are getting much higher p-values compared to mine. They are also > taking the step of excluding quite a few of the miRNAs from the > experiment based on their standard deviation across the arrays of each > group. Should I be doing this also or is this taken into account by > the eBayes() function or lmFit()? > > If you are interested the script I wrote to do the analysis is here: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor /18032/match=miRNA > > Thanks for any advice, > > -Paul. > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > -- Robert Gentleman, PhD Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M2-B876 PO Box 19024 Seattle, Washington 98109-1024 206-667-7700 rgentlem at fhcrc.org
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Hi thanks for the advice Robert, I'm new to this. Anyway here's my list of commands: library(limma) Cy3 <- "F532 Median - B532" Cy3b <- "B532 Mean" targets <- readTargets("targets.csv") RG <- read.maimages( targets$FileName, source="genepix",columns=list(R=Cy3,G=Cy3, Rb=Cy3b, Gb=Cy3b)) # remove the extraneous values red channel values RG$R <- NULL RG$Rb <- NULL pData <- data.frame(population = c('a', 'a', 'a', 'a', 'b', 'b', 'b')) rownames(pData) <- RG$targets$FileName design <- model.matrix(~factor(pData$population)) library('vsn') mat <- vsnMatrix(RG$G) rownames(mat at hx) <- RG$genes$Name mat at hx <- mat at hx[order(rownames(mat at hx)), ] corfit <- duplicateCorrelation(mat, design, ndups=4) fit <- lmFit(mat, design, ndups=4, correlation=corfit$consensus) ebayes <- eBayes(fit) topTable(ebayes, coef = 2, adjust = "BH", n = 399, lfc=1.5) The full script with a whole load of comments included and other stuff included can be viewed here: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor/1 8032/match=miRNA And here's my output of SessionInfo(): R version 2.6.2 (2008-02-08) i686-pc-linux-gnu locale: LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=en_IE.UTF-8;LC_COLLATE=en_IE .UTF-8;LC_MONETARY=en_IE.UTF-8;LC_MESSAGES=en_IE.UTF-8;LC_PAPER=en_IE. UTF-8;LC_NAME=C;LC_ADDRESS=C;LC_TELEPHONE=C;LC_MEASUREMENT=en_IE.UTF-8 ;LC_IDENTIFICATION=C attached base packages: [1] tools stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods [8] base other attached packages: [1] statmod_1.3.6 vsn_3.2.1 affy_1.16.0 [4] preprocessCore_1.0.0 affyio_1.6.1 Biobase_1.16.3 [7] limma_2.12.0 loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] grid_2.6.2 lattice_0.17-6 rcompgen_0.1-17 Hope thats better, Paul Geeleher Department of Mathematics National University of Ireland Galway Ireland On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Robert Gentleman <rgentlem at="" fhcrc.org=""> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Please check the posting guide and provide us with the information > requested there (like sessionInfo and the commands you ran). And I typically > don't give any advice (excpet to follow the posting guide) to people who > don't use signatures that identify them. > > Robrt > > > Paul Geeleher wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> This is the first time I've ever analyzed a microarray experiment >> using Limma (or anything else for that matter) and I was hoping that >> somebody could look at my results and tell me if they look normal. >> >> The experiment is measuring differential expression between miRNAs of >> HER2+ and HER2- breast cancer tissue. There are 3 HER2+ arrays and 4 >> HER2- arrays and each of the 399 miRNAs is replicated 4 times in each >> array. >> >> TopTable() reveals the following miRNAs with a fold change above 1.5, >> which I thought was a reasonable cutoff: >> >> ID logFC t P.Value adj.P.Val >> B >> 273 hsa-miR-451 -4.645060 -8.226854 4.510441e-09 9.246404e-07 >> 10.8484797 >> 128 hsa-miR-205 3.551495 7.574564 2.370061e-08 3.239083e-06 >> 9.2222865 >> 13 hsa-miR-101 -2.310652 -6.569497 3.374177e-07 2.567796e-05 >> 6.6146751 >> 282 hsa-miR-486 -2.686910 -6.542808 3.626060e-07 2.567796e-05 >> 6.5439656 >> 55 hsa-miR-144 -2.890719 -5.889594 2.152998e-06 1.261042e-04 >> 4.7952480 >> 387 mmu-miR-463 -2.609257 -5.764143 3.042120e-06 1.559086e-04 >> 4.4561920 >> 388 mmu-miR-464 -2.080402 -5.696976 3.662006e-06 1.668247e-04 >> 4.2743601 >> 151 hsa-miR-223 -1.722956 -5.637290 4.318942e-06 1.770766e-04 >> 4.1126276 >> 51 hsa-miR-142-3p -3.262824 -5.397809 8.386312e-06 3.125807e-04 >> 3.4626378 >> 14 hsa-miR-101_MM1 -1.922710 -5.224075 1.358743e-05 4.175776e-04 >> 2.9905370 >> 159 hsa-miR-26b_MM2 -2.221853 -5.206724 1.425875e-05 4.175776e-04 >> 2.9433849 >> 236 hsa-miR-376a_MM1 -1.633555 -4.653220 6.637043e-05 1.700742e-03 >> 1.4433277 >> 266 hsa-miR-432* 1.512622 4.627293 7.131510e-05 1.719952e-03 >> 1.3734422 >> 168 hsa-miR-29b -1.954087 -4.198854 2.323860e-04 4.763912e-03 >> 0.2280262 >> 31 hsa-miR-126*_MM2 -1.537988 -3.209957 3.233842e-03 5.099520e-02 >> -2.2888897 >> 52 hsa-miR-142-5p -1.881192 -2.831493 8.332384e-03 9.002153e-02 >> -3.1731794 >> >> >> Another person is sanity testing this data using GeneSpring and they >> are getting much higher p-values compared to mine. They are also >> taking the step of excluding quite a few of the miRNAs from the >> experiment based on their standard deviation across the arrays of each >> group. Should I be doing this also or is this taken into account by >> the eBayes() function or lmFit()? >> >> If you are interested the script I wrote to do the analysis is here: >> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conducto r/18032/match=miRNA >> >> Thanks for any advice, >> >> -Paul. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioconductor mailing list >> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >> Search the archives: >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >> > > -- > Robert Gentleman, PhD > Program in Computational Biology > Division of Public Health Sciences > Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center > 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M2-B876 > PO Box 19024 > Seattle, Washington 98109-1024 > 206-667-7700 > rgentlem at fhcrc.org >
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 667 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6