Entering edit mode
Pan Du
★
1.2k
@pan-du-2010
Last seen 10.3 years ago
Hi Denise,
This question was raised by other people before. Here, I just CC this
email
to Bioc mailing list, so other people can also know the reason.
First, I need to clarify how the annotation packages were created.
Here is
the building process of Bioconductor annotation packages:
Probe Id --> refSeq Id / Unigene Id --> Entrez Gene Id -- >
annotation
At each step, the mapping could be missing. For example, for the
whole-genome chips, about half of probe Id to refseq mappings are
missing
because lot of probes were not designed based on refseq database. or
updating of refseq database The lumi ID mapping packages provide
mapping
information of probe Ids to refSeq Ids. Lots of probe ids have no
refseq id
mapping available due to the reason I just mentioned. When mapping
refseq Id
to Entrez Id, still there are some mapping missing (might be due to
the
obsolete ids or update of Entrez database). I think this can explain
the
problem you found.
Pan
On 11/5/08 7:35 PM, "Denise Mauldin" <dmauldin@systemsbiology.org>
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I loaded the information from the lumiHumanAll, lumiMouseAll, and
lumiRatAll R
> packages and the HumanIDMapping and MouseIDMapping packages into a
database.
> When I'm doing a comparison between the tables, I find that there
are 22,468
> nu IDs that are in the lumiXXAll packages and not in the IDMapping
packages,
> which is likely due to the fact that there is no RatIDMapping
package.
> However, when I look for nu IDs that are in the IDMapping packages
and not in
> the lumiXXXAll packages, I get 268,761 IDs.
>
> For example, nu ID 'uMDxBs4BOkJwTJzwQo' is present in MouseWG6_V1,
> MouseWG6_V1_1_R2_11234304_A, MouseWG6_V1_B, and
MouseWG6_V2_0_R0_11278593_A,
> however it doesn't have an entry in the lumiMouseAll package. This
means that
> I don't have an entrez gene ID for that nu ID. Are these errors
because there
> is no information for 268,761 of these IDs?
>
> I've attached a list of these IDs in case I'm doing something
incorrectly.
>
> Thanks,
> Denise
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]