Illumina annotation packages discrepancy
0
0
Entering edit mode
@renaud-gaujoux-3125
Last seen 10.3 years ago
Hi list, I've got BeadSummary data from Illumina (Array content: HUMANREF-8_V2_11223162_B.XML.xml). I imported it in R using the function lumi.batch. This automatically computed the nuID for each probe and set the annotation package to lumiHumanAll.db. This is all good. BUT, when I do lookUp(nuIDs, 'lumiHumanAll.db', 'GENENAME') I get 2921out of 20589 probes with NA. If I do the same using the old annotation package lumiHumanV2: lookUp(nuIDs, 'lumiHumanV2', 'GENENAME') I get 454 out of 20589 probes with NA. Finally, if I do the same using the annotation package illuminaHumanv2.db (but based on the corresponding TargetIDs): lookUp(targetIDs, 'illuminaHumanv2.db', 'GENENAME') I get 2041out of 20589 probes with NA. Can anybody give me an explanation for that discrepancy? And what annotation package I should use as it looks like some interesting probes (for my experiment) don't have annotation in the new version? Also I could not find any reference to that HUMANREF-8_V2_11223162_B annotation (neither on Illumina website nor in Bioconductor packages). I only found information about HUMANREF-8_V2_11223162_A. Is the letter suffix (A or B) really important? Thanks
Annotation probe lumi Annotation probe lumi • 960 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 558 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6