Problem with p-values calculated by eBayes
1
0
Entering edit mode
@chen-zhuoxun-3131
Last seen 10.2 years ago
> Hi Bioconductors, > > > > > I have a very weird problem with the statistics with my microarray > data. I would like to ask for your help. > > > > I am running a microarray with 16 groups, 3 samples/group. On my > genechip, every probe is spotted 2 times. > > > > By comparing two groups (let¡¯s say A and B), I came across a gene th > at is very significant by running the following codes, with a p-valu > e= 0.001669417 > > > > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > corfit <- duplicateCorrelation(Gvsn, design = design, ndups = 2, > spacing = 1) > > fit <- lmFit(Gvsn, design = design, ndups = 2, spacing = 1, > correlation = corfit$consensus) > > contrast.matrix <- makeContrasts(A-B, levels=design) > > fit2 <- contrasts.fit(fit, contrast.matrix) > > fit3 <- eBayes(fit2) > > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Then, I looked at the raw data; copy and paste onto Excel and did a > simple t-test > > > > > > A > > B > > 1 > > 6.938162 > > 7.093199 > > 2 > > 7.012382 > > 8.05612 > > 3 > > 7.000305 > > 6.999078 > > > > > > > > Avg > > 6.983616 > > 7.382799 > > contrast > > 0.399182 > > > > p-value > > > > > > one tailed, unequal variance, t-test > > 0.179333 > > > > one tailed, equal variance, t-test > > 0.151844 > > > > The p-value is NOT even close to 0.05. Then I looked at the contrast > of fit3$coefficient, it is 0.399182, which indicates the data input > for the codes are correct. > > > > I don¡¯t understand why it has such a huge difference on p-value betw > een those two methods. Could somebody please help me with it? > > > > Thanks, > > Zhuoxun Chen > > > > > > SessionInfo: > > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > R version 2.8.0 (2008-10-20) > > i386-pc-mingw32 > > > > locale: > > LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252;LC_CTYPE=English_United States. > 1252;LC_MONETARY=English_United States. > 1252;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=English_United States.1252 > > > > attached base packages: > > [1] grid splines tools stats graphics grDevices > utils datasets methods base > > > > other attached packages: > > [1] gplots_2.6.0 gdata_2.4.2 > gtools_2.5.0 org.Hs.eg.db_2.2.6 GSEABase_1.4.0 > > [6] PGSEA_1.10.0 Ruuid_1.20.0 > Rgraphviz_1.20.2 XML_1.94-0.1 bioDist_1.14.0 > > [11] GOstats_2.8.0 Category_2.8.0 > genefilter_1.22.0 survival_2.34-1 RBGL_1.18.0 > > [16] annotate_1.20.0 xtable_1.5-4 > graph_1.20.0 eArrayCanary.db_1.0.0 annaffy_1.14.0 > > [21] KEGG.db_2.2.5 GO.db_2.2.5 > RSQLite_0.7-1 DBI_0.2-4 AnnotationDbi_1.4.0 > > [26] statmod_1.3.6 RODBC_1.2-3 > RColorBrewer_1.0-2 vsn_3.8.0 affy_1.20.0 > > [31] Biobase_2.2.0 lattice_0.17-15 limma_2.16.3 > > > > loaded via a namespace (and not attached): > > [1] affyio_1.10.1 cluster_1.11.11 preprocessCore_1.4.0 > > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Microarray GO probe Microarray GO probe • 681 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@chen-zhuoxun-3131
Last seen 10.2 years ago
Hi Bioconductors, I have a very weird problem with the statistics with my microarray data. I would like to ask for your help. I am running a microarray with 16 groups, 3 samples/group. On my genechip, every probe is spotted 2 times. By comparing two groups (let’s say A and B), I came across a gene that is very significant by running the following codes, with a p-value= 0.001669417 -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- corfit <- duplicateCorrelation(Gvsn, design = design, ndups = 2, spacing = 1) fit <- lmFit(Gvsn, design = design, ndups = 2, spacing = 1, correlation = corfit$consensus) contrast.matrix <- makeContrasts(A-B, levels=design) fit2 <- contrasts.fit(fit, contrast.matrix) fit3 <- eBayes(fit2) -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Then, I looked at the raw data; copy and paste onto Excel and did a simple t-test A B 1 6.938162 7.093199 2 7.012382 8.05612 3 7.000305 6.999078 Avg 6.983616 7.382799 contrast 0.399182 p-value one tailed, unequal variance, t-test 0.179333 one tailed, equal variance, t-test 0.151844 The p-value is NOT even close to 0.05. Then I looked at the contrast of fit3$coefficient, it is 0.399182, which indicates the data input for the codes are correct. I don’t understand why it has such a huge difference on p-value between those two methods. Could somebody please help me with it? Thanks, Zhuoxun Chen SessionInfo: -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - R version 2.8.0 (2008-10-20) i386-pc-mingw32 locale: LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252;LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252;LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=English_United States.1252 attached base packages: [1] grid splines tools stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base other attached packages: [1] gplots_2.6.0 gdata_2.4.2 gtools_2.5.0 org.Hs.eg.db_2.2.6 GSEABase_1.4.0 [6] PGSEA_1.10.0 Ruuid_1.20.0 Rgraphviz_1.20.2 XML_1.94-0.1 bioDist_1.14.0 [11] GOstats_2.8.0 Category_2.8.0 genefilter_1.22.0 survival_2.34-1 RBGL_1.18.0 [16] annotate_1.20.0 xtable_1.5-4 graph_1.20.0 eArrayCanary.db_1.0.0 annaffy_1.14.0 [21] KEGG.db_2.2.5 GO.db_2.2.5 RSQLite_0.7-1 DBI_0.2-4 AnnotationDbi_1.4.0 [26] statmod_1.3.6 RODBC_1.2-3 RColorBrewer_1.0-2 vsn_3.8.0 affy_1.20.0 [31] Biobase_2.2.0 lattice_0.17-15 limma_2.16.3 loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] affyio_1.10.1 cluster_1.11.11 preprocessCore_1.4.0 -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 489 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6