Probe-level rma vs. gene-level rma in "Affy"
2
0
Entering edit mode
Skewes,Aaron ▴ 60
@skewesaaron-3164
Last seen 10.2 years ago
Hello, Can anybody advise me on how to get gene-level rma vs. probe-level rma using rma(...) method in the Affy package for the HTHGU133A platform? Thank You, Aaron [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
affy affy • 1.5k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
balag Ganesan ▴ 140
@balag-ganesan-3020
Last seen 10.2 years ago
Hi AaronYou can try this code below. Much of this has been compiled from information out of R vignettes and the RMA Express website (*rma* express.bmbolstad.com). Before doing all this you may want to either download and/or install the correct libraries to read in your chips. After you have done that: For standard RMA normalization i.e. gene-level data > library(affy) > setwd("<your working="" dir="" that="" has="" the="" cel="" files="">") > eset<-justRMA() You can also do > data<-ReadAffy() > eset<-rma(data) To write out your data > write.exprs(eset,file="eset.txt") Get probe level unnormalized intensities of Affy data > pmdata=log2(pm(data)) # for 2-logged data > write.table(pmdata,file="my_pm_data.txt",sep="\t") > data2=exprs(data) # for unlogged data > write.table(data2,file="my_data.txt",sep="\t") If you need probe-level intensities (unnormalized) w. corresponding probe names rather than the probe index numbers as above will provide: > y=pm(data,geneNames(data)) # for unlogged data > write.table(y,file="file.txt") > y2=log2(pm(data,geneNames(data))) # for 2-logged data > write.table(y2,file="file2.txt") If you need normalized but unsummarized probe level intensities i.e. individual probes' intensities after background correction > data = ReadAffy() > my.PM <- apply(pm(data), 2, bg.adjust) > my.Quan <- normalize.quantilesmy.PM) > y2=log2(pm(data,geneNames(data))) > Quan_log<-log2(my.Quan) > rownames(Quan_log)=rownames(y2) > colnames(Quan_log)=sampleNames(data) > write.table(Quan_log,"rma_abatch_norm.txt") > write.table(Quan_log,"rma_abatch_norm.txt",quote=F,sep="\t") On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Skewes,Aaron <askewes@mdanderson.org>wrote: > Hello, > > Can anybody advise me on how to get gene-level rma vs. probe-level rma > using rma(...) method in the Affy package for the HTHGU133A platform? > > Thank You, > Aaron > > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@james-w-macdonald-5106
Last seen 4 days ago
United States
Hi Aaron, Can you clarify this a bit? By probe-level rma do you mean probeset-level? What do you mean by gene-level? Best, Jim Skewes,Aaron wrote: > Hello, > > Can anybody advise me on how to get gene-level rma vs. probe-level rma using rma(...) method in the Affy package for the HTHGU133A platform? > > Thank You, > Aaron > > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor -- James W. MacDonald, M.S. Biostatistician Hildebrandt Lab 8220D MSRB III 1150 W. Medical Center Drive Ann Arbor MI 48109-5646 734-936-8662
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Actually, I am a bit confused by this too. I am attempting to reconstruct the protocol that Broad Institute uses for Copy number analysis. They told me that level 2 data is Probe-level RMA and level 3 data is gene-level RMA. What I think they really do is as follows: Level 2 is RMA for each "spot" or probe Level 3 is RMA by gene (which should be same as probe-set), but I am unclear how they summarize each probe-set (average?). I think what I need to do is ask them for more details. Thanks, Aaron -----Original Message----- From: James W. MacDonald [mailto:jmacdon@med.umich.edu] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 1:06 PM To: Skewes,Aaron Cc: bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [BioC] Probe-level rma vs. gene-level rma in "Affy" Hi Aaron, Can you clarify this a bit? By probe-level rma do you mean probeset-level? What do you mean by gene-level? Best, Jim Skewes,Aaron wrote: > Hello, > > Can anybody advise me on how to get gene-level rma vs. probe-level rma using rma(...) method in the Affy package for the HTHGU133A platform? > > Thank You, > Aaron > > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor -- James W. MacDonald, M.S. Biostatistician Hildebrandt Lab 8220D MSRB III 1150 W. Medical Center Drive Ann Arbor MI 48109-5646 734-936-8662
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 533 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6