Is it normal that normalize.loess does not tolerate a single NA value?
0
0
Entering edit mode
Emmanuel Levy ▴ 270
@emmanuel-levy-1240
Last seen 6.9 years ago
Dear all, I have been using normalize.loess and I get the following error message when my matrix contains NA values: > my.mat = matrix(nrow=100, ncol=4, runif(400) ) > my.mat[1,1]=NA > my.mat.n = normalize.loess(my.mat, verbose=TRUE) Done with 1 vs 2 in iteration 1 Done with 1 vs 3 in iteration 1 Done with 1 vs 4 in iteration 1 Done with 2 vs 3 in iteration 1 Done with 2 vs 4 in iteration 1 Done with 3 vs 4 in iteration 1 1 0.317319 Warning messages: 1: In means[, j] + aux : ?longer object length is not a multiple of shorter object length 2: In means[, k] - aux : ?longer object length is not a multiple of shorter object length ... Is that normal? I'm scared that this introduces abnormalities in the normalization. Thanks for your help, Emmanuel > sessionInfo() R version 2.8.0 (2008-10-20) x86_64-pc-linux-gnu locale: LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=en_CA.UTF-8;LC_COLLATE=en_CA .UTF-8;LC_MONETARY=C;LC_MESSAGES=en_CA.UTF-8;LC_PAPER=en_CA.UTF-8;LC_N AME=C;LC_ADDRESS=C;LC_TELEPHONE=C;LC_MEASUREMENT=en_CA.UTF-8;LC_IDENTI FICATION=C attached base packages: [1] splines ? tools ? ? stats ? ? graphics ?grDevices utils ? ? datasets [8] methods ? base other attached packages: ?[1] limma_2.16.3 ? ? ? ?GOstats_2.4.0 ? ? ? Category_2.4.0 ?[4] genefilter_1.22.0 ? survival_2.34-1 ? ? RBGL_1.16.0 ?[7] annotate_1.20.1 ? ? xtable_1.5-4 ? ? ? ?GO.db_2.2.0 [10] AnnotationDbi_1.2.2 RSQLite_0.6-9 ? ? ? DBI_0.2-4 [13] graph_1.18.0 ? ? ? ?YEAST_2.0.1 ? ? ? ? affy_1.20.0 [16] Biobase_2.2.1 loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] affyio_1.10.1 ? ? ? ?cluster_1.11.11 ? ? ?preprocessCore_1.4.0 [4] tcltk_2.8.0
• 915 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 593 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6